Performance Results


Gaming 5% Tree trunk	Desktop 77% Battleship	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	9.13% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	69.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-3470-$59 223,595 User benchmarks, average bench 63% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	82.4% Excellent	Memory 91.9 1-Core 112 2-Core 219 81% 141 Pts	4-Core 423 8-Core 416 56% 420 Pts	64-Core 419 26% 419 Pts
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 82.4% Great: 71%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6700 4,583 User benchmarks, average bench 8% XFX(1682 3149) 1GB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008 Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	9.13% Terrible	Lighting 12 Reflection 9.42 Parallax 9.94 10% 10.4 fps	MRender 9.1 Gravity 8.53 Splatting 10.9 8% 9.5 fps
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 9.13% Great: 9%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 210GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT01B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 206 207 241 245 245 243 MB/s Performing below potential (5^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	69.1% Good	Read 256 Write 245 Mixed 230 SusWrite 231 54% 241 MB/s	4K Read 29 4K Write 47 4K Mixed 35.8 115% 37.3 MB/s	DQ Read 203 DQ Write 192 DQ Mixed 197 148% 197 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 69.1% Great: 124%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Nanya M2F4G64CB8HD5N-CG 1x4GB 19 User benchmarks, average bench 26% 1 of 2 slots used 4GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	30.5% Below average	MC Read 9.9 MC Write 9.7 MC Mixed 8.5 27% 9.37 GB/s	SC Read 9.9 SC Write 10.1 SC Mixed 9.6 28% 9.87 GB/s	Latency 64.2 62% 64.2 ns
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 30.5% Great: 30%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 24%

Surfboard

Desktop 76%

Battleship

Workstation 19%

Surfboard

RAM
Vengeance LP DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBCorsairBench 50%, 27,024 samples	8x
99U5471-050.A00LF 99U5471-040.A00LF 16GBKingstonBench 48%, 13 samples	5x
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x4GBHyperX $35Bench 51%, 38,490 samples	5x

Value: 84% - Excellent

Total price: $223

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16