ECS H55H-M

Performance Results


Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 27% Raft	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 50%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	10.6% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	60.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Motherboard	ECS H55H-M (all builds)
Memory	1.1 GB free of 2 GB @ 0 GHz
Display	1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20100212
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Aug 04 '16 at 21:06
Run Duration	369 Seconds
Run User	RUS-User
Background CPU	7%

PC Performing as expected (54^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3 530-$45 16,724 User benchmarks, average bench 46% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.95 GHz Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	50% Average	Memory 68.1 1-Core 69.4 2-Core 128 53% 88.5 Pts	4-Core 186 8-Core 187 25% 187 Pts	64-Core 188 12% 188 Pts
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 50% Great: 51%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 550-Ti-$250 54,392 User benchmarks, average bench 9% Gigabyte(1458 351A) 1GB Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 10.18.13.6881 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	10.6% Very poor	Lighting 11.9 Reflection 12.7 Parallax 9.97 10% 11.5 fps	MRender 16.3 Gravity 12.6 Splatting 15.9 12% 14.9 fps
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 10.6% Great: 9%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Intel 530 Series 240GB-$149 16,872 User benchmarks, average bench 76% 176GB free (System drive) Firmware: DC32 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below potential (12^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 -15023795599760 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1313 (AA) Unknown 100 100 0 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AE) Unknown 100 100 123 (B7) Unknown 100 100 493 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 40 53 60133015592 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 123 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 60 (E1) Load/Unload cycle count 100 100 149399 (E2) Load-in time 100 100 65535 (E3) Torque amplification count 100 100 62 (E4) Power-off retract count 100 100 65535 (E8) Unknown 100 100 0 (E9) Unknown 100 100 0 (F1) Unknown 100 100 149399 (F2) Unknown 100 100 260220 (F9) Unknown 100 100 17525	60.6% Good	Read 261 Write 226 Mixed 208 52% 232 MB/s	4K Read 26.3 4K Write 54.4 4K Mixed 20.9 95% 33.8 MB/s	DQ Read 175 DQ Write 176 DQ Mixed 45.1 70% 132 MB/s
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 60.6% Great: 91%
WD Red 1TB (2012)-$62 37,583 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 243GB free Firmware: 82.00A82 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (24^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 142 136 3900 (04) Start/Stop count 98 98 2082 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 253 0 (09) Power-on hours count 97 97 2440 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 715 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 21 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 199 199 5337 (C2) HDA temperature 105 90 38 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 253 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 100 253 0	56.4% Above average	Read 91 Write 105 Mixed 75.7 68% 90.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.54 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 0.28 92% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 56.4% Great: 87%
Kingston DataTraveler HyperX USB 3.0 64GB-$104 633 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 43GB free, PID 162b Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	9.6% Terrible	Read 33 Write 14.1 Mixed 19.8 25% 22.3 MB/s	4K Read 3.6 4K Write 0.29 4K Mixed 0.74 48% 1.54 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 9.6% Great: 83%
UFD 2.0 Silicon-Power32G 32GB 445 User benchmarks, average bench 6% 8GB free, PID 1000 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing as expected (55^th percentile)	5.15% Terrible	Read 18.8 Write 5.55 Mixed 6.23 10% 10.2 MB/s	4K Read 5.09 4K Write 0.003 4K Mixed 0.005 19% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 5.15% Great: 8%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 1x2GB 99,586 User benchmarks, average bench 17% 1 of 2 slots used 2GB DIMM SDRAM Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	28.1% Poor	MC Read 9.6 MC Write 8.5 MC Mixed 11.1 28% 9.73 GB/s	SC Read 7.7 SC Write 6.4 SC Mixed 7.2 20% 7.1 GB/s	Latency 106 38% 106 ns
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 28.1% Great: 26%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical H55H-M Builds (Compare 172 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 4%

Tree trunk

Desktop 45%

Yacht

Workstation 4%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: ECS H55H-M

CPU
Core i3 540Intel $60Bench 46%, 24,563 samples	41x
Core i5 650Intel $70Bench 46%, 42,063 samples	28x
Core i3 550Intel $110Bench 47%, 19,058 samples	21x

GPU
HD Graphics (Clarkdale 0.733/0.9 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 20,588 samples	35x
GeForce GT 710NvidiaBench 3%, 187,161 samples	11x
GT 1030NvidiaBench 14%, 185,384 samples	11x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	10x
A400 120GBKingston $32Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	5x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	4x

RAM
8GBUnknownBench 34%, 82,857 samples	74x
4GBUnknownBench 26%, 42,830 samples	32x
1x4GBUnknownBench 28%, 154,807 samples	31x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 55% - Above average

Total price: $88

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16