Performance Results


Gaming 99% Nuclear submarine	Desktop 102% UFO	Workstation 100% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 102%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics	95.5% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	240% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (75%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Gigabyte Z390 AORUS ULTRA
Motherboard	Gigabyte GIGABYTE Z390 AORUS Ultra (all builds)
Memory	28.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit barev
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190116
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Feb 11 '19 at 17:14
Run Duration	202 Seconds
Run User	CZE-User
Background CPU	75%

PC Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i9-9900K-$410 354,223 User benchmarks, average bench 98% U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.7 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	102% Outstanding	Memory 93.2 1-Core 145 2-Core 299 98% 179 Pts	4-Core 592 8-Core 1,117 102% 855 Pts	64-Core 1,558 96% 1,558 Pts
Poor: 89% ↑ This bench: 102% Great: 104%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060-$324 645,160 User benchmarks, average bench 90% Gigabyte(1458 37D4) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3535 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 418.81 Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	95.5% Outstanding	Lighting 123 Reflection 117 Parallax 122 100% 121 fps	MRender 137 Gravity 103 Splatting 86.8 86% 109 fps
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 95.5% Great: 97%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$170 93,447 User benchmarks, average bench 322% 434GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1B2QEXP7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1698 1751 1844 1726 1712 1708 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	240% Outstanding	Read 1,932 Write 1,729 Mixed 1,316 SusWrite 1,740 378% 1,679 MB/s	4K Read 31 4K Write 44.9 4K Mixed 36.2 117% 37.4 MB/s	DQ Read 106 DQ Write 816 DQ Mixed 548 397% 490 MB/s
Poor: 195% ↑ This bench: 240% Great: 393%
Intel Raid 0 Volume 1TB 11,317 User benchmarks, average bench 264% 585GB free Firmware: 1.0. SusWrite @10s intervals: 609 665 655 638 660 666 MB/s Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	109% Outstanding	Read 1,054 Write 661 Mixed 618 SusWrite 649 166% 745 MB/s	4K Read 20.6 4K Write 28.9 4K Mixed 25.2 79% 24.9 MB/s	DQ Read 20.1 DQ Write 78.7 DQ Mixed 226 122% 108 MB/s
Poor: 120% ↑ This bench: 109% Great: 445%
Seagate IronWolf 4TB (2016)-$95 26,217 User benchmarks, average bench 90% 1.5TB free Firmware: SC60 SusWrite @10s intervals: 143 153 157 155 156 155 MB/s Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)	81.9% Excellent	Read 132 Write 145 Mixed 67.5 SusWrite 153 91% 124 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.7 140% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 62% ↑ This bench: 81.9% Great: 108%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown TEAMGROUP-UD4-3866 4x8GB 24 User benchmarks, average bench 104% 4 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing below potential (12^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	73.6% Very good	MC Read 26.5 MC Write 28.6 MC Mixed 22.1 74% 25.7 GB/s	SC Read 19 SC Write 27.4 SC Mixed 21.2 64% 22.5 GB/s	Latency 61.6 65% 61.6 ns
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 73.6% Great: 119%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 152%

UFO

Desktop 102%

UFO

Workstation 150%

UFO

GPU
RTX 2080-TiNvidia $441Bench 156%, 357,946 samples	825x
RTX 3080Nvidia $910Bench 187%, 424,051 samples	622x
RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia $210Bench 115%, 663,603 samples	546x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	689x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $158Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	602x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	330x

RAM
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GBCorsair $114Bench 89%, 144,399 samples	297x
Trident Z DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GBG.SKILL $113Bench 91%, 87,239 samples	263x
CMW16GX4M2C3200C16 4x8GBCorsairBench 92%, 92,358 samples	245x

Value: 93% - Outstanding

Total price: $1,410

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16