Asus P5KPL-AM IN/GB

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 45.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Boot Drive	40.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asus P5KPL-AM IN/GB (all builds)
Memory	0.6 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display	1600x900x4294967296 szín
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20090508
Uptime	4.7 Days
Run Date	Feb 09 '19 at 04:13
Run Duration	364 Seconds
Run User	UKR-User
Background CPU	19%

PC Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core2 Quad Q8400-$150 18,432 User benchmarks, average bench 45% Socket 775, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.65 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (56^th percentile)	45.6% Average	Memory 68.5 1-Core 36.9 2-Core 72.9 40% 59.4 Pts	4-Core 134 8-Core 130 18% 132 Pts	64-Core 129 8% 129 Pts
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 45.6% Great: 52%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
GOODRAM 120GB 5,433 User benchmarks, average bench 68% 67GB free (System drive) Firmware: SAFM12.2 SusWrite @10s intervals: 52 55 44 53 36 35 MB/s Performing below potential (8^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	40.9% Average	Read 183 Write 173 Mixed 100 SusWrite 45.9 28% 125 MB/s	4K Read 23.2 4K Write 45.8 4K Mixed 25.9 93% 31.6 MB/s	DQ Read 27.2 DQ Write 67.4 DQ Mixed 34.5 30% 43 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 40.9% Great: 97%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 999GB 64,984 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 104GB free Firmware: 0.1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 63 56 47 40 42 31 MB/s Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	52.3% Above average	Read 136 Write 122 Mixed 71.5 SusWrite 46.4 69% 93.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.7 131% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 52.3% Great: 110%
Sony Storage Media 8GB 1,020 User benchmarks, average bench 6% 4GB free, PID 02a5 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.6 8 8.1 8 8.1 7.7 MB/s Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	8.87% Terrible	Read 23.9 Write 7 Mixed 6 SusWrite 7.9 12% 11.2 MB/s	4K Read 5.2 4K Write 0.8 4K Mixed 0.7 70% 2.23 MB/s
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 8.87% Great: 9%
Hitachi HDT721010SLA360 1TB 24 User benchmarks, average bench 16% 22GB free, PID ce23 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 15 16 16 16 16 16 MB/s Performing below expectations (31^st percentile)	14% Very poor	Read 31.3 Write 23.7 Mixed 22.7 SusWrite 15.9 30% 23.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.7 91% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 14% Great: 21%
Kingston DataTraveler 100 G3 USB 3.0 16GB-$7 60,636 User benchmarks, average bench 13% 1GB free, PID 1666 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 4 5.5 4.7 3.2 3.9 4 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	4.12% Terrible	Read 12.2 Write 11.3 Mixed 4.2 SusWrite 4.2 10% 7.98 MB/s	4K Read 4.8 4K Write 0.1 4K Mixed 0.1 25% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 4.12% Great: 23%
TOSHIBA TransMemory 16GB 16,813 User benchmarks, average bench 7% 14GB free, PID 6544 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.2 2.7 2.8 3 2.5 3 MB/s Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)	4.91% Terrible	Read 23.6 Write 2.5 Mixed 5.2 SusWrite 2.8 8% 8.52 MB/s	4K Read 3.7 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 14% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 4.91% Great: 9%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x2GB 446,702 User benchmarks, average bench 20% 2 of 2 slots used 4GB DIMM DDR2 Performing as expected (47^th percentile)	16.6% Very poor	MC Read 5.6 MC Write 6.2 MC Mixed 5 16% 5.6 GB/s	SC Read 1.4 SC Write 1.5 SC Mixed 4.1 7% 2.33 GB/s	Latency 105 38% 105 ns
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 16.6% Great: 44%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical P5KPL-AM IN/GB Builds (Compare 28 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 38%

Jet ski

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P5KPL-AM IN/GB

CPU
Pentium E5300Intel $59Bench 36%, 18,604 samples	7x
Core2 Duo E8400Intel $89Bench 40%, 68,540 samples	4x
Core2 Quad Q6600Intel $100Bench 42%, 59,658 samples	3x

GPU
GeForce 9500 GTNvidiaBench 2%, 27,834 samples	7x
GeForce 9600 GTNvidiaBench 4%, 20,826 samples	3x
GeForce GT 640NvidiaBench 6%, 34,519 samples	3x

SSD
Ultimate SU800 512GBAdata $83Bench 104%, 31,280 samples	2x
750 EVO 250GBSamsung $55Bench 94%, 75,831 samples	1x
SSD 240GBBench 75%, 38,401 samples	1x

RAM
2x2GBUnknownBench 20%, 446,702 samples	17x
3GBUnknownBench 14%, 81,553 samples	4x
1x2GBUnknownBench 17%, 99,586 samples	4x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 38% - Below average

Total price: $143

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16