Asus P5KPL-AM IN/GB

Performance Results

Benchmarks - excluding GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 20.5%, this CPUs suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Boot Drive40.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. Find active processes with Windows task manager (CTRL+SHIFT+ESC).
MotherboardAsus P5KPL-AM IN/GB  (all builds)
Memory0.6 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1600x900x4294967296 szín
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20090508
Uptime4.7 Days
Run DateFeb 09 '19 at 04:13
Run Duration364 Seconds
Run User UKR-User
Background CPU 19%

 PC Performing below expectations (31st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Single core Quad core Multi core
Intel Core2 Quad Q8400-$230
Socket 775, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.65 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
20.5% Poor
SC Int 58
SC Float 36.9
SC Mixed 46.7
38% 47.2 Pts
QC Int 212
QC Float 134
QC Mixed 67
31% 138 Pts
MC Int 217
MC Float 129
MC Mixed 172
26% 173 Pts
Poor: 25%
This bench: 20.5%
Great: 40%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
GOODRAM 120GB
67GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SAFM12.2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 52 55 44 53 36 35 MB/s
Performing below potential (12th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
40.9% Average
Read 183
Write 173
Mixed 100
SusWrite 45.9
28% 125 MB/s
4K Read 23.2
4K Write 45.8
4K Mixed 25.9
93% 31.6 MB/s
DQ Read 27.2
DQ Write 67.4
DQ Mixed 34.5
30% 43 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 40.9%
Great: 88%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 999GB
104GB free
Firmware: 0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 63 56 47 40 42 31 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
52.3% Above average
Read 136
Write 122
Mixed 71.5
SusWrite 46.4
69% 93.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.7
131% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 52.3%
Great: 113%
Sony Storage Media 8GB
4GB free, PID 02a5
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.6 8 8.1 8 8.1 7.7 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
8.87% Terrible
Read 23.9
Write 7
Mixed 6
SusWrite 7.9
12% 11.2 MB/s
4K Read 5.2
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.7
70% 2.23 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 8.87%
Great: 9%
Hitachi HDT721010SLA360 1TB
22GB free, PID ce23
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 15 16 16 16 16 16 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
14% Very poor
Read 31.3
Write 23.7
Mixed 22.7
SusWrite 15.9
30% 23.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.7
91% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 2%
This bench: 14%
Great: 21%
Kingston DataTraveler 100 G3 USB 3.0 16GB-$4
1GB free, PID 1666
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4 5.5 4.7 3.2 3.9 4 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
4.12% Terrible
Read 12.2
Write 11.3
Mixed 4.2
SusWrite 4.2
10% 7.98 MB/s
4K Read 4.8
4K Write 0.1
4K Mixed 0.1
25% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 4.12%
Great: 24%
TOSHIBA TransMemory 16GB
14GB free, PID 6544
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.2 2.7 2.8 3 2.5 3 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
4.91% Terrible
Read 23.6
Write 2.5
Mixed 5.2
SusWrite 2.8
8% 8.52 MB/s
4K Read 3.7
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
14% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 4.91%
Great: 8%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Unknown 2x2GB
2 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR2
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
16.6% Very poor
MC Read 5.6
MC Write 6.2
MC Mixed 5
16% 5.6 GB/s
SC Read 1.4
SC Write 1.5
SC Mixed 4.1
7% 2.33 GB/s
Latency 105
38% 105 ns
Poor: 11%
This bench: 16.6%
Great: 38%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds (explanation by AdoredTV).

Typical P5KPL-AM IN/GB Builds (Compare 107 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 30%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus P5KPL-AM IN/GB

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 46% - Average Total price: $174
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i7-8700K $360Nvidia GTX 1070 $345Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $46
AMD Ryzen 5 1600 $149Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $230Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $80
Intel Core i5-8600K $259Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti $808Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $92
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $43Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $110SanDisk Extreme 64GB $43
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $750SanDisk Extreme 32GB $48
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $41Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $120SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $12
Today's hottest deals
User Guide  •  About  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback