Asus P5KPL-AM IN/GB

Performance Results

Benchmarks - excluding GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 14%, this CPUs suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Boot Drive40.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. Find active processes with Windows task manager (CTRL+SHIFT+ESC).
MotherboardAsus P5KPL-AM IN/GB  (all builds)
Memory0.6 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1600x900x4294967296 szín
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20090508
Uptime4.7 Days
Run DateFeb 09 '19 at 04:13
Run Duration364 Seconds
Run User UKR-User
Background CPU 19%

 PC Performing below expectations (30th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Extreme
Intel Core2 Quad Q8400-$230
Socket 775, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.65 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
14% Very poor
1-Core 46.7
2-Core 88.2
32% 67.4 Pts
4-Core 67
8-Core 164
14% 115 Pts
64-Core 172
12% 172 Pts
Poor: 18%
This bench: 14%
Great: 32%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
GOODRAM 120GB
67GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SAFM12.2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 52 55 44 53 36 35 MB/s
Performing below potential (9th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
40.9% Average
Read 183
Write 173
Mixed 100
SusWrite 45.9
28% 125 MB/s
4K Read 23.2
4K Write 45.8
4K Mixed 25.9
93% 31.6 MB/s
DQ Read 27.2
DQ Write 67.4
DQ Mixed 34.5
30% 43 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 40.9%
Great: 100%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 999GB
104GB free
Firmware: 0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 63 56 47 40 42 31 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
52.3% Above average
Read 136
Write 122
Mixed 71.5
SusWrite 46.4
69% 93.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.7
131% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 52.3%
Great: 113%
Sony Storage Media 8GB
4GB free, PID 02a5
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.6 8 8.1 8 8.1 7.7 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
8.87% Terrible
Read 23.9
Write 7
Mixed 6
SusWrite 7.9
12% 11.2 MB/s
4K Read 5.2
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.7
70% 2.23 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 8.87%
Great: 9%
Hitachi HDT721010SLA360 1TB
22GB free, PID ce23
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 15 16 16 16 16 16 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
14% Very poor
Read 31.3
Write 23.7
Mixed 22.7
SusWrite 15.9
30% 23.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.7
91% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 2%
This bench: 14%
Great: 22%
Kingston DataTraveler 100 G3 USB 3.0 16GB-$4
1GB free, PID 1666
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4 5.5 4.7 3.2 3.9 4 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
4.12% Terrible
Read 12.2
Write 11.3
Mixed 4.2
SusWrite 4.2
10% 7.98 MB/s
4K Read 4.8
4K Write 0.1
4K Mixed 0.1
25% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 4.12%
Great: 23%
TOSHIBA TransMemory 16GB
14GB free, PID 6544
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.2 2.7 2.8 3 2.5 3 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
4.91% Terrible
Read 23.6
Write 2.5
Mixed 5.2
SusWrite 2.8
8% 8.52 MB/s
4K Read 3.7
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
14% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 4.91%
Great: 9%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Unknown 2x2GB
2 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR2
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
16.6% Very poor
MC Read 5.6
MC Write 6.2
MC Mixed 5
16% 5.6 GB/s
SC Read 1.4
SC Write 1.5
SC Mixed 4.1
7% 2.33 GB/s
Latency 105
38% 105 ns
Poor: 10%
This bench: 16.6%
Great: 44%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds (explanation by AdoredTV).

Typical P5KPL-AM IN/GB Builds (Compare 133 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 27%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P5KPL-AM IN/GB

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 11% - Very poor Total price: $73
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
AMD Ryzen 5 3600 $198Nvidia GTX 1070 $400Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $86
Intel Core i5-9400F $143Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $270Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $103
Intel Core i5-9600K $230Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti $750Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $195
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $75SanDisk Extreme 64GB $128
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $40G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $695SanDisk Extreme 32GB $48
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $80Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $80SanDisk Extreme 16GB $24
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback