Fill Q7700

Performance Results


Gaming 11% Tree trunk	Desktop 70% Battleship	Workstation 9% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 74%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	7.16% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	61.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago.

Motherboard	Fill Q7700 (all builds)
Memory	6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit cores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20130808
Uptime	2.7 Days
Run Date	Feb 06 '19 at 21:09
Run Duration	140 Seconds
Run User	BRA-User
Background CPU	5%

PC Performing as expected (51^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-3330 51,926 User benchmarks, average bench 61% Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-3330 CPU @ 3.00GHz, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	74% Very good	Memory 91.6 1-Core 87.6 2-Core 174 70% 118 Pts	4-Core 334 8-Core 298 43% 316 Pts	64-Core 323 20% 323 Pts
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 74% Great: 69%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 650-$112 69,673 User benchmarks, average bench 8% PNY(196E 0973) 1GB CLim: 1058 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 391.35 Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	7.16% Terrible	Lighting 9.47 Reflection 9.35 Parallax 13 8% 10.6 fps	MRender 13.4 Gravity 12 Splatting 0.13 6% 8.49 fps
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 7.16% Great: 9%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingdian S280 240GB 5,326 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 185GB free (System drive) Firmware: R0831B0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 357 8.2 15 31 175 33 MB/s Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)	61.3% Good	Read 429 Write 268 Mixed 348 SusWrite 103 64% 287 MB/s	4K Read 21.7 4K Write 83.4 4K Mixed 16.6 98% 40.6 MB/s	DQ Read 77.7 DQ Write 331 DQ Mixed 23.2 71% 144 MB/s
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 61.3% Great: 119%
Hitachi HUA722020ALA331 2TB 22,636 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 1TB free Firmware: JKAOA3NH SusWrite @10s intervals: 97 98 96 96 100 101 MB/s Performing as expected (46^th percentile)	54.1% Above average	Read 90.3 Write 93.9 Mixed 54.1 SusWrite 98 62% 84.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.8 148% 1 MB/s
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 54.1% Great: 68%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 99U5403-067.A00LF 2x4GB 604 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 2 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz Performing way above expectations (85^th percentile)	53.7% Above average	MC Read 19.1 MC Write 19.1 MC Mixed 17 53% 18.4 GB/s	SC Read 15.5 SC Write 15.5 SC Mixed 16.6 45% 15.9 GB/s	Latency 64.7 62% 64.7 ns
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 53.7% Great: 62%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Q7700 Builds (Compare 7 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 61%

Destroyer

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Fill Q7700

CPU
Core i5-3470SIntelBench 65%, 14,631 samples	2x
Core i5-2300IntelBench 64%, 19,722 samples	1x
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	1x

GPU
Radeon HD 6570AMDBench 5%, 19,220 samples	2x
HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples	1x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	1x

SSD
Green 240GB (2018)WD $42Bench 45%, 156,194 samples	2x
SSDNow V300 120GBKingston $38Bench 54%, 339,020 samples	1x
128GB 128GBSSDBench 65%, 7,332 samples	1x

RAM
1x8GBUnknownBench 38%, 168,538 samples	2x
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBCorsairBench 48%, 73,650 samples	1x
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 11% - Very poor

Total price: $42

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16