HP 23-g201la

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 31%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 33.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics1.71% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive32.3% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
SystemHP 23-g201la  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 2B2E
Memory3.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20140619
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateJan 31 '19 at 17:19
Run Duration115 Seconds
Run User CHL-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD E2-6110 APU R2 Graphics
P0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.5 GHz
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
33.1% Below average
Memory 50.9
1-Core 23.1
2-Core 41.8
27% 38.6 Pts
4-Core 91.5
8-Core 90
12% 90.8 Pts
64-Core 90
6% 90 Pts
Poor: 18%
This bench: 33.1%
Great: 33%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R2 Graphics
HP(103C 2B2E) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 18.2.1
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
1.71% Terrible
Lighting 1.87
Reflection 4.08
Parallax 2.38
2% 2.77 fps
MRender 2.9
Gravity 1.43
Splatting 3.09
2% 2.48 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.71%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Green 240GB (2018)-$42
88GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UF300000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 24 93 87 66 120 114 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
32.3% Below average
Read 362
Write 209
Mixed 110
SusWrite 84.1
42% 191 MB/s
4K Read 14.9
4K Write 5.4
4K Mixed 11.9
41% 10.7 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 32.3%
Great: 55%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CT51264BF160B.C16F Samsung M471B5173QH0-YK0 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (12th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
18% Very poor
MC Read 7.2
MC Write 4
MC Mixed 6.9
17% 6.03 GB/s
SC Read 5.3
SC Write 3.8
SC Mixed 6.5
15% 5.2 GB/s
Latency 158
25% 158 ns
Poor: 14%
This bench: 18%
Great: 55%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback