Asus AM1M-A

Performance Results


Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 21% Surfboard	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 17.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics	1.4% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	41.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (41%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus AM1M-A (all builds)
Memory	1.8 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display	1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20140331
Uptime	0.5 Days
Run Date	Jan 27 '19 at 05:14
Run Duration	181 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	41%

PC Performing below expectations (31^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Sempron 2650 APU R3 658 User benchmarks, average bench 25% FS1b , 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 1.45 GHz, turbo 0.95 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)	17.9% Very poor	Memory 31.4 1-Core 15.6 2-Core 29.6 17% 25.5 Pts	4-Core 27.1 8-Core 25 4% 26 Pts	64-Core 28 2% 28 Pts
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 17.9% Great: 32%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD HD 8240 3,521 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Asus(1043 8623) 64MB Ram: 64MB, Driver: 17.7 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	1.4% Terrible	Lighting 1.5 Reflection 3.12 Parallax 1.72 1% 2.11 fps	MRender 2.29 Gravity 1.13 Splatting 2.78 2% 2.07 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.4% Great: 2%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial BX500 120GB-$15 37,154 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 43GB free (System drive) Firmware: M6CR013 SusWrite @10s intervals: 156 128 155 55 40 46 MB/s Performing below expectations (20^th percentile)	41.8% Average	Read 403 Write 331 Mixed 11 SusWrite 96.9 46% 210 MB/s	4K Read 11.6 4K Write 26.7 4K Mixed 17.2 54% 18.5 MB/s	DQ Read 71 DQ Write 57 DQ Mixed 1.3 18% 43.1 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 41.8% Great: 86%
Crucial BX500 120GB-$15 37,154 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 52GB free Firmware: M6CR013 SusWrite @10s intervals: 108 216 76 49 39 49 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	34.2% Below average	Read 389 Write 306 Mixed 24.4 SusWrite 89.4 44% 202 MB/s	4K Read 18.8 4K Write 10.8 4K Mixed 4.6 40% 11.4 MB/s	DQ Read 28.2 DQ Write 57.2 DQ Mixed 0.8 12% 28.7 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 34.2% Great: 86%
SanDisk Cruzer 32GB 3,296 User benchmarks, average bench 11% 29GB free, PID 5530 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.3 0.9 4.7 4.3 1.7 4.1 MB/s Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)	13.6% Very poor	Read 31.4 Write 4.8 Mixed 13.7 SusWrite 3.3 14% 13.3 MB/s	4K Read 4.1 4K Write 2.4 4K Mixed 1.9 162% 2.8 MB/s
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 13.6% Great: 18%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown CT25664BA160B.C8FK CT25664BA160B.C8FK 4GB 12 User benchmarks, average bench 30% 800, 800 MHz 2048, 2048 MB Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	11.6% Very poor	MC Read 4.2 MC Write 3.2 MC Mixed 4.1 11% 3.83 GB/s	SC Read 3.5 SC Write 3.2 SC Mixed 4.4 11% 3.7 GB/s	Latency 247 16% 247 ns
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 11.6% Great: 38%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical AM1M-A Builds (Compare 64 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 33%

Sail boat

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus AM1M-A - $44

CPU
Athlon 5350 APU R3AMDBench 34%, 3,720 samples	34x
Athlon 5150 APU R3AMDBench 32%, 1,478 samples	17x
Sempron 2650 APU R3AMDBench 25%, 658 samples	7x

GPU
Radeon HD 8400-R3AMDBench 2%, 11,968 samples	26x
HD 8240AMDBench 1%, 3,521 samples	6x
GTX 560 TiNvidia $188Bench 16%, 42,397 samples	2x

SSD
SSDNow V300 120GBKingston $38Bench 54%, 339,020 samples	4x
SD8SN8U-512G-1006 512GBSandiskBench 75%, 1,494 samples	3x
Solid State Disk 128GBSpccBench 69%, 14,793 samples	3x

RAM
KHX1600C10D3/8G KHX1600C10D3/4G 8GBKingstonBench 49%, 1,528 samples	2x
CT51264BA160BJ.C8 1x4GBCrucialBench 27%, 1,234 samples	2x
BLS4G3D1609DS1S00. BLS4G3D1609DS1S00. 8GBUnknownBench 38%, 2,343 samples	2x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 8% - Terrible

Total price: $82

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16