Asus P8H61

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 45% Yacht	Desktop 63% Destroyer	Workstation 35% Sail boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	67.9% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (21%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asus P8H61 (all builds)
Memory	1.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20110928
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jul 23 '16 at 13:03
Run Duration	405 Seconds
Run User	NZL-User
Background CPU	21%

Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-2400-$250 166,255 User benchmarks, average bench 61% LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 2.65 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	68.1% Good	Memory 84.3 1-Core 42.4 2-Core 84.6 47% 70.4 Pts	4-Core 294 8-Core 338 41% 316 Pts	64-Core 340 21% 340 Pts
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 68.1% Great: 70%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132 1,459,281 User benchmarks, average bench 80% Nvidia(10DE 119D) Driver: nvd3dum.dll Ver. 10.18.13.6881 Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - GPU OC Guide	67.9% Good	Lighting 74.2 Reflection 105 Parallax 111 60% 96.5 fps	MRender 99.4 Gravity 98.3 Splatting 103 82% 100 fps
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 67.9% Great: 88%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Seagate BUP Slim BL 2TB 5,029 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 1.5TB free Firmware: 0143 Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	18.5% Very poor	Read 34.2 Write 29 Mixed 29.8 23% 31 MB/s	4K Read 0.59 4K Write 4.19 4K Mixed 0.36 143% 1.71 MB/s
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 18.5% Great: 66%
WD Blue 640GB (2008)-$33 94,563 User benchmarks, average bench 50% 150GB free Firmware: 01.03B01 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 147 145 5633 (04) Start/Stop count 97 97 3383 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 89 89 8281 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 97 97 3372 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 78 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 199 199 3383 (C2) HDA temperature 111 102 36 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	45.1% Average	Read 82 Write 74.9 Mixed 36.3 47% 64.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.63 4K Write 2.03 4K Mixed 0.36 104% 1.01 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 45.1% Great: 62%
WD Blue 320GB (2008)-$39 64,707 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 93GB free Firmware: 12.01B01 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 155 150 5216 (04) Start/Stop count 97 97 3821 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 87 87 9643 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 97 97 3808 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 720 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 199 199 3822 (C2) HDA temperature 115 92 32 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	34.2% Below average	Read 57.6 Write 61 Mixed 23.1 35% 47.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.71 4K Write 2.43 4K Mixed 0.42 121% 1.19 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 34.2% Great: 60%
WD WD800JD-75MSA3 80GB-$105 18,464 User benchmarks, average bench 24% 21GB free (System drive) Firmware: 10.01E01 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 9 (03) Spinup time 190 157 1500 (04) Start/Stop count 98 98 2884 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 76 76 17954 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 2860 (BE) vendor-specific 68 48 32 (C2) HDA temperature 111 91 32 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 3 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0
Poor: 8% Great: 33%
Generic STORAGE DEVICE 32GB 683 User benchmarks, average bench 10% 18GB free, PID 0736 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing way below expectations (20^th percentile)	5.79% Terrible	Read 18.5 Write 9.87 Mixed 8.05 14% 12.2 MB/s	4K Read 3.89 4K Write 0.01 4K Mixed 0.008 15% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 5.79% Great: 19%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 9905458-026.A00LF 8GB 158 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)	51.4% Above average	MC Read 18 MC Write 18.9 MC Mixed 16.7 51% 17.9 GB/s	SC Read 13.6 SC Write 15 SC Mixed 16 42% 14.9 GB/s	Latency 73 55% 73 ns
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 51.4% Great: 53%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical P8H61 Builds (Compare 397 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 18%

Surfboard

Desktop 63%

Destroyer

Workstation 14%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P8H61 - $77

CPU
Core i3-2100Intel $49Bench 51%, 63,701 samples	41x
Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples	40x
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	37x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	33x
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	19x
GeForce 210NvidiaBench 1%, 98,254 samples	18x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	23x
A400 120GBKingston $32Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	12x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	11x

RAM
2x4GBUnknownBench 39%, 424,126 samples	10x
1x8GBUnknownBench 38%, 168,538 samples	9x
99U5471-012.A00LF 8GBKingstonBench 47%, 1,159 samples	7x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 85% - Excellent

Total price: $213

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $46

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16