Gigabyte GA-H270-Gaming 3

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 48%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 37%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (77th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 23 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics61.3% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-H270-Gaming 3  (all builds)
Memory9.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170209
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 23 '19 at 01:20
Run Duration154 Seconds
Run User IDN-User
Background CPU 16%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (77th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7500-$89
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 2.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
74% Very good
Memory 83.9
1-Core 96.7
2-Core 192
72% 124 Pts
4-Core 372
8-Core 369
50% 370 Pts
64-Core 368
23% 368 Pts
Poor: 45%
This bench: 74%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
Nvidia(10DE 11D7) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 417.71
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
61.3% Good
Lighting 77.4
Reflection 76.8
Parallax 67
63% 73.7 fps
MRender 69.9
Gravity 70.8
Splatting 71.5
58% 70.8 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 61.3%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$100
71GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,240
Write 1,413
Mixed 1,086
348% 1,580 MB/s
4K Read 54.9
4K Write 127
4K Mixed 72
242% 84.5 MB/s
DQ Read 938
DQ Write 866
DQ Mixed 980
714% 928 MB/s
Poor: 160% Great: 280%
WD WD2003FYPS-27W9B 2TB
815GB free
Firmware: 04.05G09
SusWrite @10s intervals: 84 85 83 85 86 87 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
50.2% Above average
Read 89.7
Write 93.2
Mixed 83.2
SusWrite 85
65% 87.8 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.8
164% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 50.2%
Great: 61%
WD Blue 250GB (2007)-$20
67GB free
Firmware: 02.03E02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 72 72 73 72 72 72 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
43.5% Average
Read 79.5
Write 80
Mixed 54.5
SusWrite 71.9
53% 71.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.9
160% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 43.5%
Great: 55%
SanDisk Cruzer Slice 32GB
28GB free, PID 5566
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.4 5.3 5.5 5.1 5.5 5.3 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
11.7% Very poor
Read 22
Write 3.5
Mixed 6.7
SusWrite 5.3
10% 9.38 MB/s
4K Read 3.8
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 2.6
174% 2.83 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 11.7%
Great: 12%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2666 C16 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2664 MHz
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
81.2% Excellent
MC Read 28.9
MC Write 32.2
MC Mixed 26.7
84% 29.3 GB/s
SC Read 15.9
SC Write 32.8
SC Mixed 21.6
67% 23.4 GB/s
Latency 73.6
54% 73.6 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 81.2%
Great: 100%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-H270-Gaming 3 Builds (Compare 1,304 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 48%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 41%
Speed boat

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H270-Gaming 3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 76% - Very good Total price: $383
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback