Medion Akoya P5207 F/C023

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 10% Tree trunk	Desktop 68% Battle cruiser	Workstation 8% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	15.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (59%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Medion Akoya P5207 F/C023 (all builds)
Motherboard	MEDION H110H4-CM2
Memory	3.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kleuren
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20150908
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Jan 22 '19 at 11:57
Run Duration	204 Seconds
Run User	NLD-User
Background CPU	59%

PC Performing below expectations (27^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-6400-$79 171,457 User benchmarks, average bench 61% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	67.5% Good	Memory 79 1-Core 98.9 2-Core 198 71% 125 Pts	4-Core 314 8-Core 378 45% 346 Pts	64-Core 350 22% 350 Pts
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 67.5% Great: 71%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-$120 66,662 User benchmarks, average bench 15% Elitegroup(1019 1026) 1GB CLim: 1293 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 390.77 Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)	15.4% Very poor	Lighting 19 Reflection 15.3 Parallax 15.8 16% 16.7 fps	MRender 22.3 Gravity 18.4 Splatting 16 15% 18.9 fps
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 15.4% Great: 16%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$31 1,562,409 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 614GB free (System drive) Firmware: CC45 SusWrite @10s intervals: 56 33 38 76 79 46 MB/s Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	64.1% Good	Read 168 Write 162 Mixed 16 SusWrite 54.8 72% 100 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.7 144% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 64.1% Great: 112%
HGST Deskstar NAS 4TB-$60 7,986 User benchmarks, average bench 73% 2TB free Firmware: MJAOA5E0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 28 27 31 27 30 28 MB/s Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	31.4% Below average	Read 81.3 Write 27.3 Mixed 29.7 SusWrite 28.3 31% 41.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 0.2 4K Mixed 0.5 93% 0.5 MB/s
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 31.4% Great: 92%
Seagate Expansion Desk 5TB 11,776 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 1TB free Firmware: 9401 SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.8 7.3 0.8 1.6 1.2 0.7 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	12.4% Very poor	Read 37.7 Write 37.5 Mixed 20.3 SusWrite 3.4 18% 24.7 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 5.5 4K Mixed 0.6 210% 2.37 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 12.4% Great: 87%
Seagate Expansion Desk 5TB 11,776 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 3TB free Firmware: 9401 SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.7 9.5 12 11 12 15 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	13.7% Very poor	Read 35 Write 38.5 Mixed 20 SusWrite 11.2 19% 26.2 MB/s	4K Read 1.2 4K Write 3.7 4K Mixed 0.7 196% 1.87 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 13.7% Great: 87%
Intenso USB 3.0 device 3TB 287 User benchmarks, average bench 52% 2.5TB free Firmware: 0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.4 9.6 12 12 12 12 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	12.1% Very poor	Read 30.5 Write 39.2 Mixed 31.7 SusWrite 11.1 21% 28.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.8 154% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 12.1% Great: 91%
ST4000DM 000-2AE166 4TB 25 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 2TB free, PID 0400 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.4 8.3 7.9 7.8 7.7 7.8 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	12.6% Very poor	Read 37.5 Write 37.3 Mixed 30.5 SusWrite 8.1 37% 28.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.8 88% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 12.6% Great: 74%
WD Elements 2TB 35,768 User benchmarks, average bench 24% 1.5TB free, PID 1021 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.5 8.5 9.2 9.4 9.1 9.5 MB/s Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)	13.9% Very poor	Read 30 Write 38 Mixed 25 SusWrite 9 34% 25.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2.4 4K Mixed 0.7 108% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 13.9% Great: 44%
Multiple Card Reader 32GB 2,863 User benchmarks, average bench 13% 26GB free, PID 6366 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 16 19 19 19 19 19 MB/s Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)	9.36% Terrible	Read 24.2 Write 14.3 Mixed 13.5 SusWrite 18.6 23% 17.6 MB/s	4K Read 5 4K Write 0.2 4K Mixed 0.5 42% 1.9 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 9.36% Great: 22%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Nanya M2F8G64CC8HD5N-DI 1x8GB 1,807 User benchmarks, average bench 28% 1 of 2 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing above expectations (62^nd percentile)	30.4% Below average	MC Read 10.2 MC Write 10.3 MC Mixed 9.1 28% 9.87 GB/s	SC Read 8.9 SC Write 9.9 SC Mixed 9.8 27% 9.53 GB/s	Latency 82.3 49% 82.3 ns
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 30.4% Great: 33%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Akoya P5207 F/C023 Builds (Compare 11 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 12%

Tree trunk

Desktop 66%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 10%

Tree trunk

System: Medion Akoya P5207 F/C023

CPU
Core i5-6400Intel $79Bench 61%, 171,457 samples	10x
Core i7-6700Intel $180Bench 72%, 282,363 samples	1x

GPU
GTX 750Nvidia $120Bench 15%, 66,662 samples	6x
GeForce GT 710NvidiaBench 3%, 187,161 samples	1x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	1x

SSD
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	2x
Green 120GB (2018)WD $59Bench 43%, 69,933 samples	1x
SSDSCKKF180H6L 180GBIntelBench 67%, 260 samples	1x

RAM
M2F8G64CC8HD5N-DI 1x8GBNanyaBench 28%, 1,807 samples	7x
M2F8G64CC8HD5N-DI 2x8GBNanyaBench 49%, 1,126 samples	2x
HMT41GU6MFR8C-PB 1x8GBHynixBench 29%, 2,350 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 49% - Average

Total price: $237

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16