DELL Studio XPS 435T/9000

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics30.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive44.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory20GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 20GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemDELL Studio XPS 435T/9000  (all builds)
MotherboardDELL 0X501H
Memory11.2 GB free of 20 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20090728
Uptime6.3 Days
Run DateJan 18 '19 at 14:33
Run Duration172 Seconds
Run User JPN-User
Background CPU5%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-920-$90
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.65 GHz, turbo 2.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
66.8% Good
Memory 93.3
1-Core 60.8
2-Core 141
61% 98.4 Pts
4-Core 229
8-Core 273
32% 251 Pts
64-Core 259
16% 259 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 66.8%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 411.70
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
30.9% Below average
Lighting 38
Reflection 30
Parallax 32.8
31% 33.6 fps
MRender 38.1
Gravity 38.7
Splatting 36.3
31% 37.7 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 30.9%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Transcend SSD340 256GB-$194
29GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SVN263
SusWrite @10s intervals: 116 103 94 95 93 92 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
44.3% Average
Read 233
Write 144
Mixed 124
SusWrite 99
33% 150 MB/s
4K Read 19.4
4K Write 38.6
4K Mixed 17.4
72% 25.1 MB/s
DQ Read 166
DQ Write 155
DQ Mixed 95.8
90% 139 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 44.3%
Great: 98%
WD Green 1TB (2010)-$139
917GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 103 104 102 105 105 104 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
59.3% Above average
Read 103
Write 102
Mixed 79.2
SusWrite 104
72% 97.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.6
126% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 59.3%
Great: 59%
WD Green 2TB (2012)-$49
872GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 69 70 70 69 71 70 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
38% Below average
Read 62
Write 63
Mixed 41.5
SusWrite 69.7
43% 59 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.9
178% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 38%
Great: 84%
WDC WD20 EADS-00R6B0 2TB
85GB free, PID 012a
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 26 26 26 27 27 27 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
15.8% Very poor
Read 30.5
Write 26
Mixed 23
SusWrite 26.5
35% 26.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.6
84% 0.97 MB/s
BUFFALO External HDD 4TB
1TB free, PID 0286
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 28 28 27 28 29 28 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
18.4% Very poor
Read 32.7
Write 27
Mixed 27.2
SusWrite 27.9
38% 28.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1.1
122% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 18.4%
Great: 68%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 20GB
null MHz
4096, 4096, 2048, 4096, 2048, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (31st percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
32.9% Below average
MC Read 11.3
MC Write 10.3
MC Mixed 9.5
30% 10.4 GB/s
SC Read 9.4
SC Write 10
SC Mixed 10.1
28% 9.83 GB/s
Latency 61.3
65% 61.3 ns
Poor: 22%
This bench: 32.9%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Studio XPS 435T/9000 Builds (Compare 455 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard

System: DELL Studio XPS 435T/9000

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 85% - Excellent Total price: $177
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $131Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $186Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback