PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
Graphics | 28.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 52.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications. |
Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
System | Dell Precision WorkStation T3500 (all builds) |
Motherboard | Dell 0XPDFK |
Memory | 6.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20130528 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Jan 18 '19 at 05:33 |
Run Duration | 130 Seconds |
Run User | USA-User |
Background CPU | 5% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Xeon W3565
CPU, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg)
|
63.3%
Good
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
AMD Radeon RX 470
Dell(1028 1006) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1206 MHz, MLim: 1650 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 17.12
Performing below potential (31st percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
28.3%
Poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
CHN 25SATAA3 120 120GB
95GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Q1124A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 196 217 232 229 227 227 MB/s
|
52.2%
Above average
|
|||
SanDisk Ultra USB 3.0 32GB-$8
28GB free, PID 5581
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 16 16 17 17 16 17 MB/s
|
10.9%
Very poor
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Unknown 4x2GB
4 of 6 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3
|
31.8%
Below average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Xeon W3530Intel $290Bench 65%, 5,773 samples | 477x |
Xeon W3550IntelBench 66%, 7,649 samples | 330x |
Xeon X5670IntelBench 73%, 9,061 samples | 243x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 172x |
Quadro 2000NvidiaBench 6%, 15,855 samples | 155x |
GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples | 126x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 69% - Good | Total price: $377 |