PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
Graphics | 28.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 78.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times. |
Memory | 32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
System | Gigabyte Z170-HD3 |
Motherboard | Gigabyte GA-Z170-HD3 (all builds) |
Memory | 21.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz |
Display | 3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20170306 |
Uptime | 1.8 Days |
Run Date | Jan 17 '19 at 15:37 |
Run Duration | 237 Seconds |
Run User | USA-User |
Background CPU | 14% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
79.2%
Very good
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
Gigabyte(1458 3775) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2012 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 417.71
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
28.4%
Poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
SanDisk X300 256GB-$99
94GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X3510000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 215 216 141 101 145 159 MB/s
|
78.1%
Very good
|
|||
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$45
138GB free
Firmware: 3B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1241 370 301 301 300 299 MB/s
|
183%
Outstanding
|
|||
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$109
99GB free
Firmware: EMT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 473 420 427 449 443 400 MB/s
|
112%
Outstanding
|
|||
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$50
490GB free
Firmware: CC25
SusWrite @10s intervals: 140 147 147 147 146 147 MB/s
|
90.8%
Outstanding
|
|||
JMicron H/W RAID5 8TB
3TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 219 230 239 238 242 232 MB/s
|
84.6%
Excellent
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Unknown DDR4 2400 2OZ 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (9th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
67.3%
Good
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i5-6600KIntel $81Bench 72%, 342,244 samples | 478x |
Core i7-6700KIntel $180Bench 81%, 588,978 samples | 437x |
Core i7-6700Intel $180Bench 72%, 282,363 samples | 193x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples | 234x |
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 178x |
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples | 117x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 97% - Outstanding | Total price: $466 |