Performance Results


Gaming 9% Tree trunk	Desktop 51% Yacht	Workstation 7% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 48.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	12.9% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	30.4% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

5 years ago, 5 years ago.

PC Performing above expectations (62^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core2 Quad Q6600-$100 59,658 User benchmarks, average bench 42% Socket 775, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	48.7% Average	Memory 78.9 1-Core 27.5 2-Core 53 39% 53.1 Pts	4-Core 110 8-Core 111 15% 110 Pts	64-Core 109 7% 109 Pts
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 48.7% Great: 50%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 460-$203 31,648 User benchmarks, average bench 12% EVGA(3842 1387) 1GB CLim: 700 MHz, MLim: 900 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 391.35 Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	12.9% Very poor	Lighting 14.8 Reflection 17.3 Parallax 13.3 12% 15.1 fps	MRender 21 Gravity 14.9 Splatting 17.5 14% 17.8 fps
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 12.9% Great: 14%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28 424,288 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 195GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFK SusWrite @10s intervals: 148 159 153 171 179 161 MB/s Performing below potential (3^rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	30.4% Below average	Read 176 Write 81.7 Mixed 73.2 SusWrite 162 28% 123 MB/s	4K Read 13.1 4K Write 17.2 4K Mixed 10.6 42% 13.6 MB/s	DQ Read 9.8 DQ Write 17 DQ Mixed 30.4 18% 19.1 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 30.4% Great: 100%
Toshiba MK6461GSY 640GB 951 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 509GB free Firmware: MJ00 SusWrite @10s intervals: 104 103 107 107 108 108 MB/s Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	60.7% Good	Read 105 Write 112 Mixed 64.2 SusWrite 106 71% 96.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 0.7 140% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 60.7% Great: 61%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 4x2GB 183,252 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 4 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DRAM Performing below potential (29^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	18.4% Very poor	MC Read 6.9 MC Write 4.7 MC Mixed 4.7 16% 5.43 GB/s	SC Read 6.2 SC Write 4.4 SC Mixed 5 15% 5.2 GB/s	Latency 82.6 48% 82.6 ns
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 18.4% Great: 45%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16