Lenovo 30BDS1F900

Performance Results


Gaming 54% Yacht	Desktop 78% Battleship	Workstation 57% Gunboat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	71.8% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	254% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Lenovo 30BDS1F900 (all builds)
Motherboard	LENOVO 1038
Memory	124 GB free of 128 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20181026
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jan 03 '19 at 19:37
Run Duration	163 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	18%

PC Performing as expected (55^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: Intel Xeon Gold 5122 133 User benchmarks, average bench 76% CPU0, 2 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (20^th percentile)	68.7% Good	Memory 52.5 1-Core 118 2-Core 236 71% 135 Pts	4-Core 454 8-Core 756 74% 605 Pts	64-Core 1,311 81% 1,311 Pts
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 68.7% Great: 83%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro P4000 12,628 User benchmarks, average bench 67% Nvidia(10DE 11A3) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1708 MHz, MLim: 1901 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 391.58 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	71.8% Very good	Lighting 87.1 Reflection 92.7 Parallax 81.4 71% 87.1 fps	MRender 88.8 Gravity 86.2 Splatting 92.7 73% 89.2 fps
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 71.8% Great: 70%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung SM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB 21,542 User benchmarks, average bench 238% 381GB free (System drive) Firmware: 6L6QCXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1048 1549 1525 1534 1531 1531 MB/s Performing as expected (57^th percentile)	254% Outstanding	Read 1,714 Write 1,457 Mixed 551 SusWrite 1,453 290% 1,294 MB/s	4K Read 35.7 4K Write 137 4K Mixed 47.8 188% 73.6 MB/s	DQ Read 951 DQ Write 814 DQ Mixed 831 637% 865 MB/s
Poor: 149% ↑ This bench: 254% Great: 306%
Sandisk SD9SB8W512G1001 512GB 124 User benchmarks, average bench 95% 477GB free Firmware: X6106001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 337 448 396 397 396 398 MB/s Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)	101% Outstanding	Read 483 Write 462 Mixed 391 SusWrite 395 97% 433 MB/s	4K Read 30.9 4K Write 70.2 4K Mixed 38.9 134% 46.7 MB/s	DQ Read 375 DQ Write 324 DQ Mixed 277 228% 325 MB/s
Poor: 66% ↑ This bench: 101% Great: 113%
Lexar JumpDrive 64GB 100 User benchmarks, average bench 31% 55GB free, PID 0700 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 64 68 69 69 69 69 MB/s Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	45.7% Average	Read 200 Write 68.2 Mixed 79.6 SusWrite 67.9 120% 104 MB/s	4K Read 5.2 4K Write 0.2 4K Mixed 0 26% 1.8 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 45.7% Great: 46%
JetFlash Transcend 16GB 14,782 User benchmarks, average bench 14% 15GB free, PID 1000 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 16 18 18 18 18 18 MB/s Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)	6.87% Terrible	Read 14.3 Write 9.3 Mixed 5.2 SusWrite 17.9 15% 11.7 MB/s	4K Read 3.8 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 14% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 6.87% Great: 33%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M393A2K43BB1-CTD 8x16GB 50 User benchmarks, average bench 101% 8 of 16 slots used 128GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	67.2% Good	MC Read 31.7 MC Write 24.9 MC Mixed 26.1 79% 27.6 GB/s	SC Read 6.2 SC Write 6.9 SC Mixed 6.8 19% 6.63 GB/s	Latency 152 26% 152 ns
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 67.2% Great: 136%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Lenovo 30BDS1F900

Performance Results

PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Feedback

PC Performing as expected (55^th percentile)