Asus SABERTOOTH X58

Performance Results


Gaming 22% Surfboard	Desktop 69% Battle cruiser	Workstation 18% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	32.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	41.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Asus SABERTOOTH X58 (all builds)
Memory	8.3 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display	1920x1080x4294967296 szín
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20120809
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Dec 14 '18 at 05:19
Run Duration	176 Seconds
Run User	HUN-User
Background CPU	3%

Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7 930-$199 19,497 User benchmarks, average bench 64% LGA1366, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)	62% Good	Memory 81.1 1-Core 74.3 2-Core 148 61% 101 Pts	4-Core 233 8-Core 352 36% 292 Pts	64-Core 369 23% 369 Pts
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 62% Great: 72%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% Asus(1043 8626) CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 398.11 Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	32.1% Below average	Lighting 40.2 Reflection 31.1 Parallax 37.8 33% 36.4 fps	MRender 38.4 Gravity 38.2 Splatting 36.7 31% 37.8 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 32.1% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston HyperX 3K 120GB-$100 46,066 User benchmarks, average bench 74% 11GB free (System drive) Firmware: 521ABBF0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 53 49 53 54 52 67 MB/s Performing below potential (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	41.2% Average	Read 187 Write 127 Mixed 164 SusWrite 54.7 30% 133 MB/s	4K Read 22.4 4K Write 39.3 4K Mixed 27 89% 29.6 MB/s	DQ Read 30.7 DQ Write 77.3 DQ Mixed 35.8 32% 47.9 MB/s
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 41.2% Great: 87%
SSD 240GB 38,401 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 98GB free Firmware: SAFM13.2 SusWrite @10s intervals: 164 166 194 192 197 187 MB/s Performing below potential (7^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	47.3% Average	Read 220 Write 218 Mixed 188 SusWrite 183 46% 202 MB/s	4K Read 19.9 4K Write 37.2 4K Mixed 24.2 81% 27.1 MB/s	DQ Read 26.4 DQ Write 63.9 DQ Mixed 32.6 28% 41 MB/s
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 47.3% Great: 95%
Samsung HD502IJ 500GB-$40 25,285 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 20GB free Firmware: 1AA01113 SusWrite @10s intervals: 55 54 54 55 53 68 MB/s Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)	39.3% Below average	Read 80 Write 76.8 Mixed 49.8 SusWrite 56.4 48% 65.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 1.1 187% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 39.3% Great: 59%
Samsung HM641JI 640GB-$50 10,598 User benchmarks, average bench 37% 113GB free Firmware: 2AJ10003 SusWrite @10s intervals: 41 43 44 46 44 45 MB/s Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)	26.8% Poor	Read 49.6 Write 20 Mixed 38.2 SusWrite 43.8 28% 37.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.3 4K Write 1 4K Mixed 0.5 87% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 26.8% Great: 50%
Toshiba DT01ACA050 500GB-$25 163,843 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 293GB free Firmware: MS1OA7S0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 130 125 152 150 153 151 MB/s Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)	86.7% Excellent	Read 159 Write 120 Mixed 35.8 SusWrite 143 83% 114 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.6 133% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 86.7% Great: 103%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 12GB 85,415 User benchmarks, average bench 35% null MHz 4096, 4096, 2048, 2048 MB Performing below potential (8^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	20.8% Poor	MC Read 7.2 MC Write 5.6 MC Mixed 5.2 17% 6 GB/s	SC Read 7.4 SC Write 7.5 SC Mixed 6.8 21% 7.23 GB/s	Latency 78.5 51% 78.5 ns
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 20.8% Great: 50%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical SABERTOOTH X58 Builds (Compare 1,655 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 35%

Jet ski

Desktop 73%

Battleship

Workstation 28%

Raft

Motherboard: Asus SABERTOOTH X58

CPU
Core i7-950Intel $100Bench 66%, 36,389 samples	605x
Core i7 960Intel $220Bench 68%, 16,233 samples	291x
Xeon X5675IntelBench 75%, 8,072 samples	88x

GPU
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	116x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	88x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	79x

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	67x
860 Evo 1TBSamsung $130Bench 112%, 602,853 samples	55x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	47x

RAM
6x4GBUnknownBench 47%, 28,320 samples	308x
3x4GBUnknownBench 42%, 39,448 samples	253x
6x2GBUnknownBench 46%, 38,297 samples	185x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 59% - Above average

Total price: $380

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16