| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (15th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 85 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 39.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor. |
| Boot Drive | 57.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
| Motherboard | Asus P5Q DELUXE (all builds) |
| Memory | 6.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.7 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs |
| OS | Windows 7 |
| BIOS Date | 20080723 |
| Uptime | 1.1 Days |
| Run Date | Dec 11 '18 at 21:47 |
| Run Duration | 115 Seconds |
| Run User | FRA-User |
| Background CPU | 18% |
PC Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
39.3%
Below average
|
33% 47.6 Pts
|
14% 108 Pts
|
7% 107 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
AMD R9 280X-$500
CLim: 1100 MHz, MLim: 1600 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 18.3.1
|
121% 49.5 fps
| |||
| Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
103GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 206 215 173 177 220 197 MB/s
|
57.4%
Above average
|
48% 212 MB/s
|
108% 34.9 MB/s
|
36% 49.5 MB/s
|
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Unknown 4x2GB
4 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR
|
15.3%
Very poor
|
14% 4.8 GB/s
|
13% 4.47 GB/s
|
32% 126 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical P5Q DELUXE Builds (Compare 203 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asus P5Q DELUXE
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core2 Quad Q9550Intel $161Bench 49%, 34,093 samples | 71x |
| Core2 Quad Q9650Intel $170Bench 51%, 16,719 samples | 20x |
| Core2 Quad Q9400Intel $170Bench 46%, 24,176 samples | 15x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 960Nvidia $198Bench 33%, 440,282 samples | 11x |
| HD 4870ATIBench 9%, 22,563 samples | 10x |
| GeForce GT 730NvidiaBench 5%, 164,888 samples | 10x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 40% - Below average | Total price: $459 |