Gigabyte GA-Z87-D3HP-CF

Performance Results


Gaming 13% Tree trunk	Desktop 71% Battleship	Workstation 11% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	11.7% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	76% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (42%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago.

System	Gigabyte Z87-D3HP
Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-Z87-D3HP-CF (all builds)
Memory	10 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20140812
Uptime	1.3 Days
Run Date	Dec 08 '18 at 22:27
Run Duration	178 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	42%

PC Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-4770K-$120 172,887 User benchmarks, average bench 74% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)	70.5% Very good	Memory 70.5 1-Core 116 2-Core 220 75% 135 Pts	4-Core 379 8-Core 605 60% 492 Pts	64-Core 611 38% 611 Pts
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 70.5% Great: 84%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD R9 280X-$500 94,130 User benchmarks, average bench 35% PwrHis(1787 3001) 3GB CLim: 1050 MHz, MLim: 1500 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 18.10.2 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	11.7% Very poor	Lighting 0.1 Reflection 33.8 Parallax 63.8 0% 32.6 fps	MRender 32.5 Gravity 49.9 Splatting 41.9 34% 41.4 fps
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 11.7% Great: 39%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SanDisk Ultra Plus 256GB-$139 17,545 User benchmarks, average bench 81% 49GB free (System drive) Firmware: X2316RL SusWrite @10s intervals: 246 281 219 237 245 227 MB/s Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)	76% Very good	Read 463 Write 327 Mixed 247 SusWrite 242 71% 320 MB/s	4K Read 23.9 4K Write 55 4K Mixed 29.2 103% 36 MB/s	DQ Read 288 DQ Write 202 DQ Mixed 120 123% 203 MB/s
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 76% Great: 99%
Seagate Barracuda Green 2TB-$95 81,608 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 72GB free Firmware: CC3C SusWrite @10s intervals: 55 66 78 88 67 56 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	35.7% Below average	Read 56.2 Write 59 Mixed 48 SusWrite 68.3 43% 57.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 0.6 4K Mixed 0.6 103% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 35.7% Great: 75%
TOSHIBA STOR.E PARTNER 1TB 758 User benchmarks, average bench 23% 184GB free, PID b001 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 95 96 97 96 96 96 MB/s Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	33.8% Below average	Read 81.8 Write 79 Mixed 23.2 SusWrite 96.1 93% 70 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 0.3 4K Mixed 0.4 25% 0.37 MB/s
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 33.8% Great: 40%
ASMT 2115 500GB 2,879 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 21GB free, PID 1153 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 25 37 35 21 21 24 MB/s Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	12.4% Very poor	Read 35.7 Write 30.5 Mixed 16.3 SusWrite 27.2 36% 27.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 0.4 4K Mixed 0.2 22% 0.33 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 12.4% Great: 166%
Seagate Desktop 1TB 4,684 User benchmarks, average bench 17% 45GB free, PID 3300 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 39 39 40 39 40 39 MB/s Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)	17.9% Very poor	Read 37.5 Write 38.7 Mixed 29.7 SusWrite 39.3 50% 36.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 0.9 74% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 17.9% Great: 21%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial BLS8G3D1609ES2LX0. 2x8GB 2,705 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	44% Average	MC Read 15.5 MC Write 15.3 MC Mixed 17.5 46% 16.1 GB/s	SC Read 8.3 SC Write 9.8 SC Mixed 11.5 28% 9.87 GB/s	Latency 100 40% 100 ns
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 44% Great: 64%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-Z87-D3HP-CF Builds (Compare 807 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 68%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z87-D3HP-CF

CPU
Core i7-4770KIntel $120Bench 74%, 172,887 samples	184x
Core i5-4670KIntel $62Bench 68%, 128,482 samples	158x
Core i7-4770Intel $75Bench 70%, 176,321 samples	133x

GPU
HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 230,189 samples	72x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	52x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	42x

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	31x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $109Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	24x
860 Evo 1TBSamsung $130Bench 112%, 602,853 samples	22x

RAM
RipjawsX DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBG.SKILLBench 49%, 28,220 samples	28x
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 59%, 122,541 samples	21x
Savage DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBHyperXBench 51%, 78,181 samples	20x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 65% - Good

Total price: $215

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $125	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16