Asrock H67M

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 38%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics50.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive65.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
MotherboardAsrock H67M  (all builds)
Memory6.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120427
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 08 '18 at 18:39
Run Duration153 Seconds
Run User ROU-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2500
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
73.9% Very good
Memory 89.9
1-Core 93.1
2-Core 164
70% 116 Pts
4-Core 334
8-Core 347
45% 340 Pts
64-Core 351
22% 351 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 73.9%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 290-$399
CLim: 957 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 18.5.1
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
50.7% Above average
Lighting 62.5
Reflection 56.5
Parallax 74.3
51% 64.4 fps
MRender 56.6
Gravity 51
Splatting 72
50% 59.9 fps
Poor: 41%
This bench: 50.7%
Great: 50%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 750 EVO 250GB-$42
128GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MAT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 291 127 105 120 127 124 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
65.5% Good
Read 372
Write 357
Mixed 270
SusWrite 149
64% 287 MB/s
4K Read 29.3
4K Write 52.8
4K Mixed 38.4
122% 40.2 MB/s
DQ Read 38.8
DQ Write 105
DQ Mixed 52.5
46% 65.5 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 65.5%
Great: 114%
Hitachi HUA722020ALA330 2TB
147GB free
Firmware: JKAOA3EA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 77 66 76 78 74 82 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
45.1% Average
Read 81.3
Write 91.5
Mixed 50.5
SusWrite 75.7
55% 74.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.9
157% 1 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 45.1%
Great: 70%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37
459GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 109 109 109 109 109 111 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
56.9% Above average
Read 88.5
Write 83.5
Mixed 51.5
SusWrite 109
61% 83.2 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1.1
216% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 56.9%
Great: 109%
WD Blue 1TB (2010)-$39
9GB free
Firmware: 15.01H15
SusWrite @10s intervals: 64 60 59 56 51 49 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
34.8% Below average
Read 65
Write 66
Mixed 50.5
SusWrite 56.2
44% 59.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.5
98% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 34.8%
Great: 74%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5471-056.A00LF 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
29.6% Poor
MC Read 9.4
MC Write 9.6
MC Mixed 8.6
26% 9.2 GB/s
SC Read 8.7
SC Write 9.7
SC Mixed 9.4
26% 9.27 GB/s
Latency 67.4
59% 67.4 ns
Poor: 22%
This bench: 29.6%
Great: 34%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H67M Builds (Compare 169 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock H67M - $104

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 68% - Good Total price: $350
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback