PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 47.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average. |
Graphics | 3.31% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 30.8% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
System | HP EliteBook 8730w (all builds) |
Motherboard | Hewlett-Packard 30EC |
Memory | 5.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.8 GHz |
Display | 1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit Farben |
OS | Windows 7 |
BIOS Date | 20111207 |
Uptime | 0.1 Days |
Run Date | Dec 05 '18 at 21:37 |
Run Duration | 130 Seconds |
Run User | DEU-User |
Background CPU | 64% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core2 Extreme Q9300-$172
Intel(R) Genuine processor, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.55 GHz
|
47.4%
Average
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia Quadro FX 2700M
HP(103C 30EC) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 342.0
|
3.31%
Terrible
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Sandisk PLUS 120 GB 120GB
41GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UE45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 150 88 72 83 75 85 MB/s
|
30.8%
Below average
|
|||
SanDisk Ultra USB 3.0 32GB-$7
17GB free, PID 5581
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 16 15 17 16 17 MB/s
|
10.9%
Very poor
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Unknown 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR2
Performing below potential (13th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
19.3%
Very poor
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core2 Duo T9600Intel $170Bench 39%, 2,726 samples | 14x |
Core2 Duo T9400Intel $55Bench 39%, 3,295 samples | 7x |
Core2 Duo P8600Intel $42Bench 37%, 8,502 samples | 5x |
GPU | |
---|---|
Quadro FX 2700MNvidiaBench 3%, 788 samples | 23x |
Mobility Radeon HD 3670ATIBench 2%, 405 samples | 13x |
Quadro FX 3700MNvidiaBench 6%, 383 samples | 3x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 34% - Below average | Total price: $230 |