Gigabyte X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING

Performance Results


Gaming 46% Yacht	Desktop 83% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 43% Speed boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	51.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	226% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Gigabyte X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING
Motherboard	Gigabyte X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING (all builds)
Memory	26.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display	2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180808
Uptime	0.2 Days
Run Date	Dec 05 '18 at 05:30
Run Duration	687 Seconds
Run User	BRA-User
Background CPU	16%

Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 1600-$110 392,253 User benchmarks, average bench 70% AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (76^th percentile)	73.1% Very good	Memory 71.7 1-Core 110 2-Core 216 73% 132 Pts	4-Core 401 8-Core 625 63% 513 Pts	64-Core 849 53% 849 Pts
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 73.1% Great: 78%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130 360,351 User benchmarks, average bench 52% Gigabyte(1458 22F9) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1340 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 17.1.1 Performing below potential (66^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	51.6% Above average	Lighting 64.8 Reflection 66 Parallax 80.3 53% 70.4 fps	MRender 63.9 Gravity 63.4 Splatting 55.6 49% 60.9 fps
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 51.6% Great: 56%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Adata XPG SX8200 NVMe PCIe M.2 480GB-$60 15,626 User benchmarks, average bench 216% 189GB free (System drive) Firmware: SVN139B Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 0 0 0 0 1520 1525 MB/s Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile)	226% Outstanding	Read 2349 Write 1,504 Mixed 1,160 SusWrite 508 306% 1,380 MB/s	4K Read 57.1 4K Write 94.4 4K Mixed 70.9 227% 74.1 MB/s	DQ Read 1,006 DQ Write 317 DQ Mixed 532 426% 618 MB/s
Poor: 127% ↑ This bench: 226% Great: 333%
Samsung Spinpoint F1 750GB-$60 30,974 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 342GB free Firmware: 1AA01113 SusWrite @10s intervals: 0 0 0 1.6 56 58 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	26.7% Poor	Read 73.1 Write 33.7 Mixed 49.5 SusWrite 19.3 33% 43.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 0.9 172% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 26.7% Great: 60%
Samsung Spinpoint F1 750GB-$60 30,974 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 472GB free Firmware: 1AA01113 SusWrite @10s intervals: 0 0 0 1.5 88 88 MB/s Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)	34.5% Below average	Read 90.2 Write 44.7 Mixed 57.7 SusWrite 29.5 41% 55.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 1 189% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 34.5% Great: 60%
Samsung Spinpoint F1 750GB-$60 30,974 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 351GB free Firmware: 1AA01113 SusWrite @10s intervals: 0 0 69 68 68 68 MB/s Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)	34.1% Below average	Read 72.9 Write 40.5 Mixed 50.6 SusWrite 45.4 39% 52.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 1 183% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 34.1% Great: 60%
Samsung Spinpoint F3 1TB-$83 138,859 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 28GB free Firmware: 1AJ10001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 0 0 133 133 132 133 MB/s Performing as expected (54^th percentile)	60.4% Good	Read 121 Write 42.7 Mixed 71.5 SusWrite 88.5 60% 81 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 3.3 4K Mixed 1.1 217% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 60.4% Great: 75%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$70 337,642 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 563GB free Firmware: JC45 SusWrite @10s intervals: 0 0 111 111 112 112 MB/s Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)	52.9% Above average	Read 110 Write 111 Mixed 65.8 SusWrite 74.4 66% 90.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 1 176% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 52.9% Great: 68%
Hitachi HDS721010DLE630 1TB-$150 19,279 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 672GB free Firmware: MS2OA600 SusWrite @10s intervals: 0 0 124 117 118 130 MB/s Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	58.1% Above average	Read 121 Write 119 Mixed 25.2 SusWrite 81.5 63% 86.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.1 4K Mixed 0.5 105% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 58.1% Great: 99%
Hitachi HDS721010DLE630 1TB-$150 19,279 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 169GB free Firmware: MS2OA600 SusWrite @10s intervals: 0 0 0 8.3 109 110 MB/s Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	43.7% Average	Read 114 Write 111 Mixed 23.4 SusWrite 37.9 52% 71.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.5 112% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 43.7% Great: 99%
Samsung Spinpoint F1 1TB-$100 65,786 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 237GB free Firmware: 1AA01118 SusWrite @10s intervals: 0 0 68 69 66 68 MB/s Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)	39.7% Below average	Read 92.8 Write 44.7 Mixed 58.8 SusWrite 45.2 45% 60.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 0.9 172% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 39.7% Great: 62%
Hitachi HTS545050A7E380 500GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 13% 339GB free, PID 0539 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples		Read 91.8 Write 87.9 Mixed 32.1 84% 70.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 0.4 56% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 8% Great: 15%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown CMR16GX4M2C3000C15 CMD16GX4M2B3000C15 CMR16GX4M2C3000C15 CMD16GX4M2B3000C15 32GB 6 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 3200, 3200, 3200, 3200 MHz 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB Performing as expected (40^th percentile)	109% Outstanding	MC Read 44 MC Write 40 MC Mixed 39.6 118% 41.2 GB/s	SC Read 19.3 SC Write 33.7 SC Mixed 28.7 78% 27.2 GB/s	Latency 97.4 41% 97.4 ns
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 109% Great: 111%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING-CF Builds (Compare 4,624 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 82%

Aircraft carrier

Desktop 81%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 80%

Battleship

Motherboard: Gigabyte X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING - $140

CPU
Ryzen 7 2700XAMD $210Bench 76%, 159,077 samples	1,404x
Ryzen 5 2600AMD $125Bench 73%, 179,588 samples	539x
Ryzen 5 2600XAMD $120Bench 74%, 142,983 samples	532x

GPU
RTX 2070Nvidia $200Bench 104%, 478,117 samples	318x
RTX 2060Nvidia $324Bench 90%, 645,160 samples	226x
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	206x

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	174x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 273%, 381,216 samples	171x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	135x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	244x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $36Bench 84%, 287,720 samples	183x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	156x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 95% - Outstanding

Total price: $673

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16