Asus X99-S

Performance Results

Benchmarks - excluding HDD
Gaming
Gaming 74%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 62%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.4%, this CPUs suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics80.1% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive72.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 9 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
MotherboardAsus X99-S  (all builds)
Memory12.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20170810
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 01 '18 at 22:18
Run Duration146 Seconds
Run User ZAF-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Single core Quad core Multi core
Intel Core i7-5820K-$391
SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
74.4% Very good
SC Int 94.1
SC Float 103
SC Mixed 87.6
76% 95 Pts
QC Int 378
QC Float 353
QC Mixed 370
83% 367 Pts
MC Int 749
MC Float 795
MC Mixed 785
116% 776 Pts
Poor: 71%
This bench: 74.4%
Great: 103%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 980-$500
CLim: 1531 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 391.35
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
80.1% Excellent
Lighting 249
Reflection 230
Parallax 258
78% 245 fps
MRender 177
Gravity 233
Splatting 155
82% 188 fps
Poor: 62%
This bench: 80.1%
Great: 86%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Crucial MX100 512GB-$200
54GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MU01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 413 152 69 94 81 89 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
72.6% Very good
Read 406
Write 418
Mixed 311
SusWrite 150
72% 321 MB/s
4K Read 26
4K Write 70.1
4K Mixed 34.6
121% 43.6 MB/s
DQ Read 152
DQ Write 288
DQ Mixed 177
146% 205 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 72.6%
Great: 105%
Crucial MX500 500GB-$70
466GB free
Firmware: M3CR022
SusWrite @10s intervals: 330 314 306 314 309 311 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
77% Very good
Read 332
Write 312
Mixed 311
SusWrite 314
72% 317 MB/s
4K Read 27.7
4K Write 52.1
4K Mixed 37
117% 38.9 MB/s
DQ Read 222
DQ Write 128
DQ Mixed 193
139% 181 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 77%
Great: 125%
SanDisk Ultra Fit USB 3.0 16GB-$7
12GB free, PID 5583
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.8 5.5 5.2 8 8.1 4 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
10.5% Very poor
Read 29
Write 17.8
Mixed 17.3
SusWrite 6.6
22% 17.7 MB/s
4K Read 3.7
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 1.5
109% 2.17 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 10.5%
Great: 30%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 4x4GB-$181
4 of 8 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
98.6% Outstanding
MC Read 39.2
MC Write 40.4
MC Mixed 35.7
110% 38.4 GB/s
SC Read 14.2
SC Write 17.8
SC Mixed 20.3
50% 17.4 GB/s
Latency 79.6
50% 79.6 ns
Poor: 71%
This bench: 98.6%
Great: 115%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds (explanation by AdoredTV).

Typical X99-S Builds (Compare 669 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 63%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 69%
Battle cruiser

Motherboard: Asus X99-S

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 83% - Excellent Total price: $845
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i7-8700K $366Nvidia GTX 1070 $379Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $100
AMD Ryzen 5 2600 $159Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $230Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $80
AMD Ryzen 5 1600 $115Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti $808Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $93
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $45Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $95SanDisk Extreme 64GB $128
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $75G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $711SanDisk Extreme 32GB $48
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $100SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $12
Today's hottest deals
User Guide  •  About  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback