Asus K50IJ

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 40%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 40.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics0.34% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive57.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemAsus K50IJ  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK K50IJ
Memory2.8 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colors, 1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110125
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 29 '18 at 18:24
Run Duration164 Seconds
Run User SVN-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing below expectations (27th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 Duo T9500-$125
Socket 478, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.55 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
40.9% Average
Memory 70.2
1-Core 36.6
2-Core 71.7
40% 59.5 Pts
4-Core 70.5
8-Core 71.7
10% 71.1 Pts
64-Core 69.6
4% 69.6 Pts
Poor: 30%
This bench: 40.9%
Great: 43%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Mobile Series 4 Express Chipset Family
Asus(1043 1862) 1.8GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 8.15.10.2702
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
0.34% Terrible
Lighting 0.43
Reflection 0.35
Parallax 0.41
0% 0.4 fps
MRender 0.43
Gravity 0.17
Splatting 0.52
0% 0.37 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.34%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 120GB
56GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 222 182 155 152 151 153 MB/s
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
57.8% Above average
Read 248
Write 236
Mixed 228
SusWrite 169
50% 220 MB/s
4K Read 26.6
4K Write 39.7
4K Mixed 30.8
101% 32.4 MB/s
DQ Read 139
DQ Write 132
DQ Mixed 134
101% 135 MB/s
Poor: 61%
This bench: 57.8%
Great: 115%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
78GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 223 229 230 231 231 232 MB/s
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
61.5% Good
Read 248
Write 237
Mixed 225
SusWrite 229
53% 235 MB/s
4K Read 24.4
4K Write 41.3
4K Mixed 31.7
100% 32.5 MB/s
DQ Read 145
DQ Write 138
DQ Mixed 141
106% 141 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 61.5%
Great: 124%
Samsung FIT USB 3.0 64GB-$25
38GB free, PID 1000
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 17 18 17 16 17 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
9% Terrible
Read 32.5
Write 11.9
Mixed 26.8
SusWrite 16
27% 21.8 MB/s
4K Read 3.4
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
13% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 9%
Great: 112%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x2GB
2 of 2 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR2
Performing below potential (35th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
15% Very poor
MC Read 5.4
MC Write 3.9
MC Mixed 4
13% 4.43 GB/s
SC Read 4.8
SC Write 3.9
SC Mixed 4.2
12% 4.3 GB/s
Latency 101
40% 101 ns
Poor: 10%
This bench: 15%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical K50IJ Builds (Compare 73 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 34%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Asus K50IJ

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 39% - Below average Total price: $138
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback