Asrock N68-VS3 FX

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (21st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 79 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 54.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics16.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive44.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock N68-VS3 FX  (all builds)
Memory9.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 0.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120704
Uptime5.8 Days
Run DateNov 25 '18 at 16:59
Run Duration147 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing below expectations (21st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-4100-$110
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
54.8% Above average
Memory 78.5
1-Core 58.7
2-Core 110
52% 82.4 Pts
4-Core 184
8-Core 177
24% 180 Pts
64-Core 185
11% 185 Pts
Poor: 39%
This bench: 54.8%
Great: 58%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-Ti-$92
CLim: 1346 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 388.13
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
16.5% Very poor
Lighting 20
Reflection 17.2
Parallax 18.8
16% 18.6 fps
MRender 26
Gravity 20
Splatting 17.5
17% 21.1 fps
Poor: 16%
This bench: 16.5%
Great: 19%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
103GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 198 143 48 41 32 29 MB/s
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
44.3% Average
Read 192
Write 108
Mixed 170
SusWrite 81.5
31% 138 MB/s
4K Read 22.6
4K Write 39.8
4K Mixed 29.3
93% 30.6 MB/s
DQ Read 35.9
DQ Write 71.4
DQ Mixed 46.1
37% 51.1 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 44.3%
Great: 124%
SanDisk Ultra USB 3.0 16GB-$8
10GB free, PID 5581
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 10 10 10 10 10 10 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
13.1% Very poor
Read 21.7
Write 10.9
Mixed 14
SusWrite 10.2
18% 14.2 MB/s
4K Read 4.2
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 2.6
179% 3 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 13.1%
Great: 35%
Seagate Expansion Desk 2TB
2TB free, PID 3312
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 18 19 19 18 19 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
11.1% Very poor
Read 20.2
Write 22.7
Mixed 19.3
SusWrite 18.6
28% 20.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.9
77% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 11.1%
Great: 74%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
HyperX Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM 333 MHz
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
36.8% Below average
MC Read 13.5
MC Write 12
MC Mixed 13.3
37% 12.9 GB/s
SC Read 8.5
SC Write 8.4
SC Mixed 8.8
24% 8.57 GB/s
Latency 83.4
48% 83.4 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 36.8%
Great: 72%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical N68-VS3 FX Builds (Compare 131 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock N68-VS3 FX

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 57% - Above average Total price: $138
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback