PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (21st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 79 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 54.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
Graphics | 16.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 44.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Asrock N68-VS3 FX (all builds) |
Memory | 9.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 0.3 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20120704 |
Uptime | 5.8 Days |
Run Date | Nov 25 '18 at 16:59 |
Run Duration | 147 Seconds |
Run User | GBR-User |
Background CPU | 2% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
AMD FX-4100-$110
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
|
54.8%
Above average
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 750-Ti-$92
CLim: 1346 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 388.13
|
16.5%
Very poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
103GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 198 143 48 41 32 29 MB/s
|
44.3%
Average
|
|||
SanDisk Ultra USB 3.0 16GB-$8
10GB free, PID 5581
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 10 10 10 10 10 10 MB/s
|
13.1%
Very poor
|
|||
Seagate Expansion Desk 2TB
2TB free, PID 3312
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 18 19 19 18 19 MB/s
|
11.1%
Very poor
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
HyperX Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM 333 MHz
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
36.8%
Below average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
FX-4100AMD $110Bench 51%, 32,471 samples | 18x |
FX-6300AMD $47Bench 55%, 261,607 samples | 15x |
Athlon II X2 250 (2013 D.Ri)AMDBench 40%, 19,471 samples | 12x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GeForce 7025 / nForce 630aNvidiaBench 0%, 5,527 samples | 16x |
GeForce GT 730NvidiaBench 5%, 164,888 samples | 8x |
Radeon HD 5450AMDBench 1%, 66,079 samples | 7x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 57% - Above average | Total price: $138 |