| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
| Graphics | 50.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
| Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
| Motherboard | Asus M5A99X EVO R2.0 (all builds) |
| Memory | 11 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20140403 |
| Uptime | 3.1 Days |
| Run Date | Nov 23 '18 at 21:12 |
| Run Duration | 147 Seconds |
| Run User | GBR-User |
| Background CPU | 16% |
PC Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
63.7%
Good
|
57% 92.1 Pts
|
41% 339 Pts
|
26% 413 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
CLim: 1455 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 398.82
Performing below potential (66th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
50.4%
Above average
|
49% 56 fps
|
53% 65.2 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Toshiba DT01ACA200 2TB-$40
841GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MX4OABB0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 128 131 132 135 132 133 MB/s
|
66.4%
Good
|
76% 105 MB/s
|
151% 1.13 MB/s
| |
|
|
77% 103 MB/s
|
181% 1.3 MB/s
| ||
|
Seagate BUP Slim RD 1TB
219GB free
Firmware: 0304
SusWrite @10s intervals: 23 23 23 22 23 23 MB/s
|
13.4%
Very poor
|
16% 22.2 MB/s
|
147% 1.1 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Corsair Vengeance DDR3 1866 C9 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz clocked @ 667 MHz
Performing below potential (10th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
41.3%
Average
|
42% 14.7 GB/s
|
26% 9.2 GB/s
|
51% 78.1 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical M5A99X EVO R2.0 Builds (Compare 753 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asus M5A99X EVO R2.0 - $300
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples | 379x |
| FX-8320AMD $129Bench 59%, 106,454 samples | 102x |
| FX-6300AMD $47Bench 55%, 261,607 samples | 82x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples | 44x |
| GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 43x |
| GTX 960Nvidia $198Bench 33%, 440,282 samples | 29x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 53% - Above average | Total price: $729 |