Performance Results


Gaming 41% Speed boat	Desktop 76% Battleship	Workstation 35% Sail boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	56.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	79.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.

Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Gigabyte Z87X-UD4H
Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-Z87X-UD4H-CF (all builds)
Memory	11.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit väriä
OS	Windows 8.1
BIOS Date	20140318
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Nov 16 '18 at 22:06
Run Duration	195 Seconds
Run User	FIN-User
Background CPU	14%

PC Performing as expected (47^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E3-1230 v3-$217 8,137 User benchmarks, average bench 73% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (31^st percentile)	69.6% Good	Memory 82.7 1-Core 91.7 2-Core 172 68% 115 Pts	4-Core 305 8-Core 482 48% 394 Pts	64-Core 505 31% 505 Pts
Poor: 62% ↑ This bench: 69.6% Great: 80%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119 627,793 User benchmarks, average bench 52% Nvidia(10DE 1C02) 3GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 391.35 Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	56.2% Above average	Lighting 69.6 Reflection 67.7 Parallax 66.1 57% 67.8 fps	MRender 69.1 Gravity 65.9 Splatting 67.3 55% 67.4 fps
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 56.2% Great: 56%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial BX500 240GB-$29 142,801 User benchmarks, average bench 56% 192GB free (System drive) Firmware: M6CR013 SusWrite @10s intervals: 361 365 364 363 355 370 MB/s Performing above expectations (85^th percentile)	79.7% Very good	Read 330 Write 338 Mixed 322 SusWrite 363 76% 338 MB/s	4K Read 25.3 4K Write 81.3 4K Mixed 22.5 110% 43 MB/s	DQ Read 229 DQ Write 293 DQ Mixed 46.2 95% 189 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 79.7% Great: 92%
Crucial MX500 500GB-$55 237,241 User benchmarks, average bench 106% 36GB free Firmware: M3CR010 SusWrite @10s intervals: 371 370 372 376 367 380 MB/s Performing way below expectations (20^th percentile)	95.2% Outstanding	Read 415 Write 346 Mixed 359 SusWrite 373 84% 373 MB/s	4K Read 27.2 4K Write 63.9 4K Mixed 41.7 128% 44.3 MB/s	DQ Read 369 DQ Write 320 DQ Mixed 274 225% 321 MB/s
Poor: 78% ↑ This bench: 95.2% Great: 125%
UFD 2.0 Silicon-Power4G 4GB 161 User benchmarks, average bench 5% 4GB free, PID 3e00 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 1.8 3.6 3.3 4 3.4 3.9 MB/s Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)	3.95% Terrible	Read 15.3 Write 5 Mixed 10.7 SusWrite 3.3 10% 8.57 MB/s	4K Read 4.3 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 16% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 3.95% Great: 6%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 9905403-559.A00LF 2x8GB 3,453 User benchmarks, average bench 49% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz Performing below potential (23^rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	45.5% Average	MC Read 16 MC Write 16.5 MC Mixed 14.9 45% 15.8 GB/s	SC Read 10.5 SC Write 14.5 SC Mixed 12.5 36% 12.5 GB/s	Latency 75.6 53% 75.6 ns
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 45.5% Great: 60%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 60%

Destroyer

Desktop 80%

Battleship

Workstation 50%

Yacht

GPU
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	51x
HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 230,189 samples	38x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	34x

RAM
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBCorsairBench 54%, 43,127 samples	28x
BLS8G3D1609DS1S00. 2x8GBCrucialBench 55%, 48,796 samples	20x
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBCorsairBench 53%, 34,385 samples	11x

Value: 97% - Outstanding

Total price: $332

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16