Gigabyte Z370 AORUS Gaming 5

Performance Results


Gaming 111% UFO	Desktop 102% UFO	Workstation 105% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (73rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 27 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 103%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics	107% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	114% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

System	Gigabyte Z370 AORUS Gaming 5
Motherboard	Gigabyte Z370 AORUS Gaming 5 (all builds)
Memory	12.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180705
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Nov 13 '18 at 15:16
Run Duration	202 Seconds
Run User	ESP-User
Background CPU	11%

Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-8700K-$186 746,287 User benchmarks, average bench 88% U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.9 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	103% Outstanding	Memory 94 1-Core 156 2-Core 313 102% 187 Pts	4-Core 598 8-Core 966 96% 782 Pts	64-Core 1,276 79% 1,276 Pts
Poor: 76% ↑ This bench: 103% Great: 100%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$400 1,082,454 User benchmarks, average bench 102% Gigabyte(1458 3702) CLim: 2025 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 416.34 Performing above expectations (85^th percentile)	107% Outstanding	Lighting 138 Reflection 150 Parallax 129 113% 139 fps	MRender 117 Gravity 140 Splatting 114 100% 124 fps
Poor: 93% ↑ This bench: 107% Great: 110%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$95 217,115 User benchmarks, average bench 96% 155GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXT0DB6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 379 269 273 272 273 242 MB/s Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	114% Outstanding	Read 500 Write 489 Mixed 362 SusWrite 285 92% 409 MB/s	4K Read 43.6 4K Write 110 4K Mixed 56 196% 69.8 MB/s	DQ Read 380 DQ Write 344 DQ Mixed 229 208% 318 MB/s
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 114% Great: 118%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$109 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 299GB free Firmware: EMT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 476 482 482 484 484 483 MB/s Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	136% Outstanding	Read 506 Write 488 Mixed 407 SusWrite 482 106% 471 MB/s	4K Read 48 4K Write 125 4K Mixed 66.6 224% 79.8 MB/s	DQ Read 384 DQ Write 345 DQ Mixed 359 271% 363 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 136% Great: 134%
Seagate Desktop HDD 4TB (2013)-$52 67,711 User benchmarks, average bench 77% 3TB free Firmware: CC54 SusWrite @10s intervals: 150 155 161 158 160 161 MB/s Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	91.6% Outstanding	Read 162 Write 131 Mixed 79.3 SusWrite 158 97% 132 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.7 132% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 91.6% Great: 96%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$50 815,515 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 1.5TB free Firmware: CC4H SusWrite @10s intervals: 161 164 170 173 166 173 MB/s Performing above expectations (68^th percentile)	99.8% Outstanding	Read 180 Write 157 Mixed 81.2 SusWrite 168 107% 147 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.7 135% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 99.8% Great: 114%
Seagate Barracuda Green 2TB-$95 81,608 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 312GB free Firmware: CC32 SusWrite @10s intervals: 82 82 81 86 82 85 MB/s Performing below expectations (20^th percentile)	48.3% Average	Read 83.7 Write 81.7 Mixed 30 SusWrite 82.9 51% 69.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 5.8 4K Mixed 0.4 181% 2.3 MB/s
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 48.3% Great: 75%
Seagate Barracuda Green 2TB-$95 81,608 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 1.5TB free Firmware: CC32 SusWrite @10s intervals: 121 123 122 126 124 125 MB/s Performing above expectations (85^th percentile)	70.4% Very good	Read 122 Write 122 Mixed 66 SusWrite 124 79% 108 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.1 4K Mixed 0.8 143% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 70.4% Great: 75%
WD Green 1TB (2011)-$109 43,695 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 105GB free Firmware: 51.0AB51 SusWrite @10s intervals: 54 55 56 57 57 57 MB/s Performing as expected (47^th percentile)	50.9% Above average	Read 121 Write 106 Mixed 99.2 SusWrite 55.9 71% 95.4 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.7 159% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 50.9% Great: 69%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial BLS8G4D26BFSE.16FBD2 2x8GB 2,666 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)	87.5% Excellent	MC Read 32.7 MC Write 32.9 MC Mixed 26.8 88% 30.8 GB/s	SC Read 20 SC Write 35.1 SC Mixed 27.6 79% 27.6 GB/s	Latency 59.8 67% 59.8 ns
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 87.5% Great: 99%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-Z370 AORUS Gaming 5-CF Builds (Compare 3,439 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 111%

UFO

Desktop 96%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 102%

UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte Z370 AORUS Gaming 5 - $226

CPU
Core i7-8700KIntel $186Bench 88%, 746,287 samples	1,933x
Core i5-8600KIntel $173Bench 91%, 264,837 samples	540x
Core i7-8700Intel $200Bench 87%, 349,567 samples	271x

GPU
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	479x
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	304x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	224x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $92Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	149x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	121x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 273%, 381,216 samples	110x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	154x
Trident Z RGB DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $55Bench 84%, 215,644 samples	141x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	84x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 81% - Excellent

Total price: $1,032

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16