| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing above expectations (75th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 25 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
| Graphics | 53.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 73.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
| Motherboard | Asus P8H67-V (all builds) |
| Memory | 5.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben |
| OS | Windows 7 |
| BIOS Date | 20120510 |
| Uptime | 0.3 Days |
| Run Date | Nov 11 '18 at 18:52 |
| Run Duration | 124 Seconds |
| Run User | DEU-User |
| Background CPU | 2% |
PC Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
77.2%
Very good
|
75% 128 Pts
|
51% 403 Pts
|
29% 474 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
AMD R9 290-$399
PowerColor(148C 2343) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1040 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 18.10.2
|
53.1%
Above average
|
52% 68.5 fps
|
55% 65.5 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
OCZ Trion 150 240GB-$196
71GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SAFZ
SusWrite @10s intervals: 238 172 93 169 133 50 MB/s
|
73.4%
Very good
|
79% 352 MB/s
|
100% 34 MB/s
|
187% 298 MB/s
|
|
Seagate ST32000641AS 2TB-$174
1TB free
Firmware: CC13
SusWrite @10s intervals: 110 111 111 111 111 112 MB/s
|
65.9%
Good
|
75% 102 MB/s
|
177% 1.1 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Kingston 9905471-011.A00LF 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
|
51.9%
Above average
|
50% 17.4 GB/s
|
48% 16.8 GB/s
|
64% 63 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical P8H67-V Builds (Compare 394 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asus P8H67-V
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i5-2500KIntel $246Bench 66%, 143,007 samples | 65x |
| Core i5-2400Intel $250Bench 61%, 166,255 samples | 58x |
| Core i5-2500IntelBench 63%, 82,538 samples | 45x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 29x |
| GTX 960Nvidia $198Bench 33%, 440,282 samples | 24x |
| HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples | 17x |
| SSD |
|
|---|---|
| A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples | 23x |
| 850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples | 16x |
| 860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples | 12x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 73% - Very good | Total price: $333 |