| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 90.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent. |
| Boot Drive | 206% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files. |
| Memory | 64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
| Motherboard | Asus TUF X299 MARK 2 (all builds) |
| Memory | 60.4 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.7 GHz |
| Display | 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit couleurs |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20180803 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Oct 29 '18 at 11:17 |
| Run Duration | 130 Seconds |
| Run User | FRA-User |
| Background CPU | 0% |
PC Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i9-7940X-$815
LGA 2066 R4, 1 CPU, 14 cores, 28 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
|
90.3%
Outstanding
|
85% 154 Pts
|
93% 783 Pts
|
157% 2,532 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485
Zotac(19DA 1471) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2075 MHz, MLim: 2800 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 416.34
|
1% 0.4 fps
| |||
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung 960 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$249
542GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B6QCXP7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1428 1450 1446 1478 1504 924 MB/s
|
206%
Outstanding
|
322% 1,439 MB/s
|
127% 40.9 MB/s
|
97% 130 MB/s
|
|
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80
465GB free
Firmware: 1B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 455 461 461 463 438 255 MB/s
|
87.7%
Excellent
|
101% 448 MB/s
|
120% 39.7 MB/s
|
80% 109 MB/s
|
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Corsair CMU64GX4M4C3000C15 4x16GB
4 of 8 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
66.9%
Good
|
71% 25 GB/s
|
41% 14.5 GB/s
|
50% 80.5 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical TUF X299 MARK 2 Builds (Compare 1,652 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asus TUF X299 MARK 2
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i7-7800XIntel $216Bench 78%, 22,334 samples | 495x |
| Core i7-7820XIntel $375Bench 80%, 28,524 samples | 260x |
| Core i7-7740XIntel $130Bench 87%, 5,094 samples | 148x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples | 168x |
| GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples | 151x |
| RTX 2080-TiNvidia $441Bench 156%, 357,946 samples | 92x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 74% - Very good | Total price: $796 |