HP nc75xx

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing CPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (22nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 78 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Graphics0.24% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
High background CPU (28%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP nc75xx  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 30C0
Memory2.6 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20090115
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateOct 26 '18 at 21:42
Run Duration161 Seconds
Run User JPN-User
Background CPU 28%

 PC Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 Duo T8300-$27
U10, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
1-Core 28.7
2-Core 55.6
19% 42.2 Pts
4-Core 56.2
8-Core 54
7% 55.1 Pts
64-Core 55
3% 55 Pts
Poor: 26% Great: 41%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Mobile Intel 965 Express Chipset Family
HP(103C 30C0)
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 8.15.10.1867
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
0.24% Terrible
Lighting 0.3
Reflection 0.15
Parallax 0.28
0% 0.25 fps
MRender 0.19
Gravity 0.33
Splatting 0.35
0% 0.29 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.24%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk i110 32GB
4GB free (System drive)
Firmware: i212000
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
Read 202
Write 85.7
Mixed 46.3
24% 111 MB/s
4K Read 11.7
4K Write 13.4
4K Mixed 10.2
38% 11.8 MB/s
DQ Read 17
DQ Write 14.8
DQ Mixed 13.6
11% 15.1 MB/s
Poor: 24% Great: 36%
Hitachi HTS541612J9SA00 120GB-$40
28GB free
Firmware: SBDOC7BP
SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 13 12 11 12 11 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
7.05% Terrible
Read 12.5
Write 13.5
Mixed 10.5
SusWrite 11.8
9% 12.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.4
74% 0.5 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 7.05%
Great: 25%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x2GB
2 of 2 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR2
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
9.95% Terrible
MC Read 3.9
MC Write 3.4
MC Mixed 3.4
10% 3.57 GB/s
SC Read 3.6
SC Write 3.6
SC Mixed 3.3
10% 3.5 GB/s
Latency 1,240
3% 1,240 ns
Poor: 10%
This bench: 9.95%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback