PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 38.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor. |
Graphics | 4.7% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
Memory | 3GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 3GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system. |
OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
Motherboard | Gigabyte GA-G31M-ES2L (all builds) |
Memory | 0.2 GB free of 3 GB @ 0.8 GHz |
Display | 1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 7 |
BIOS Date | 20091013 |
Uptime | 0.8 Days |
Run Date | Oct 23 '18 at 10:48 |
Run Duration | 279 Seconds |
Run User | MYS-User |
Background CPU | 0% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
38.1%
Below average
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GeForce GT 240
Device(107D 20E8) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 314.22
|
4.7%
Terrible
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung HD502HJ 500GB-$50
52GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1AJ10001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.9 7.4 8.9 4.6 7.3 12 MB/s
|
13.2%
Very poor
|
|||
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$70
399GB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 84 83 83 84 83 85 MB/s
|
38.7%
Below average
|
|||
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$70
930GB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 18 16 19 15 17 18 MB/s
|
21.4%
Poor
|
|||
HP Portable Drive 1TB
43GB free, PID 9b07
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 11 11 11 11 11 MB/s
|
11.1%
Very poor
|
|||
12.5%
Very poor
|
||||
WDC WD20 EARX-008FB0 2TB
234GB free, PID 5106
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 11 11 11 11 11 MB/s
|
11.9%
Very poor
|
|||
Samsung S2 Portable 500GB
2GB free, PID 1f05
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 11 11 11 11 12 MB/s
|
12%
Very poor
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Unknown 3GB
null MHz
2048, 1024 MB
|
15.9%
Very poor
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core2 Duo E7500Intel $109Bench 39%, 39,897 samples | 40x |
Core2 Quad Q9400Intel $170Bench 46%, 24,176 samples | 37x |
Core2 Quad Q6600Intel $100Bench 42%, 59,658 samples | 30x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GeForce 210NvidiaBench 1%, 98,254 samples | 42x |
GeForce 9500 GTNvidiaBench 2%, 27,834 samples | 24x |
GeForce GT 710NvidiaBench 3%, 187,161 samples | 23x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 45% - Average | Total price: $137 |