Gigabyte X470 AORUS GAMING 7 WIFI

Performance Results


Gaming 53% Yacht	Desktop 73% Battleship	Workstation 54% Yacht


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	75.9% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	71.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (79%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Gigabyte X470 AORUS GAMING 7 WIFI
Motherboard	Gigabyte X470 AORUS GAMING 7 WIFI (all builds)
Memory	14.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180808
Uptime	0.9 Days
Run Date	Oct 18 '18 at 11:29
Run Duration	211 Seconds
Run User	MYS-User
Background CPU	79%

PC Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X-$210 159,077 User benchmarks, average bench 76% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	65.1% Good	Memory 66.1 1-Core 94.9 2-Core 188 65% 116 Pts	4-Core 344 8-Core 638 59% 491 Pts	64-Core 1,103 68% 1,103 Pts
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 65.1% Great: 89%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-Ti-$299 412,133 User benchmarks, average bench 94% Zotac(19DA 2435) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 388.13 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	75.9% Very good	Lighting 97.5 Reflection 101 Parallax 88.2 79% 95.5 fps	MRender 84.8 Gravity 93.6 Splatting 77.6 69% 85.3 fps
Poor: 86% ↑ This bench: 75.9% Great: 101%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$100 154,949 User benchmarks, average bench 235% 173GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 812 324 321 100 48 47 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile)	71.1% Very good	Read 249 Write 239 Mixed 802 SusWrite 275 89% 391 MB/s	4K Read 26.7 4K Write 55.4 4K Mixed 12.2 85% 31.4 MB/s	DQ Read 440 DQ Write 457 DQ Mixed 575 397% 491 MB/s
Poor: 160% ↑ This bench: 71.1% Great: 280%
Intel 530 Series 120GB-$79 15,015 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 71GB free Firmware: DC32 SusWrite @10s intervals: 114 125 124 121 124 120 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	53.8% Above average	Read 356 Write 126 Mixed 167 SusWrite 121 42% 193 MB/s	4K Read 19 4K Write 48.3 4K Mixed 20.9 81% 29.4 MB/s	DQ Read 201 DQ Write 131 DQ Mixed 114 99% 149 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 53.8% Great: 79%
Samsung PM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB 99,566 User benchmarks, average bench 177% 103GB free Firmware: CXB7401Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 447 308 304 303 303 301 MB/s Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	119% Outstanding	Read 839 Write 748 Mixed 636 SusWrite 328 143% 638 MB/s	4K Read 23.4 4K Write 50.5 4K Mixed 34.8 107% 36.2 MB/s	DQ Read 785 DQ Write 632 DQ Mixed 688 521% 702 MB/s
Poor: 106% ↑ This bench: 119% Great: 236%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$30 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 298GB free Firmware: 02.01A02 SusWrite @10s intervals: 129 131 131 127 128 128 MB/s Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)	84.5% Excellent	Read 166 Write 133 Mixed 79.2 SusWrite 129 93% 127 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 1.1 205% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 84.5% Great: 109%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$30 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 167GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 162 165 164 163 159 158 MB/s Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)	85.3% Excellent	Read 135 Write 134 Mixed 80.5 SusWrite 162 94% 128 MB/s	4K Read 1.2 4K Write 2.4 4K Mixed 1.1 217% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 85.3% Great: 109%
WD Black 1TB (2010)-$49 257,835 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 611GB free Firmware: 05.01D05 SusWrite @10s intervals: 117 117 118 117 116 117 MB/s Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	70.1% Very good	Read 127 Write 117 Mixed 89.2 SusWrite 117 83% 113 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 0.8 171% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 70.1% Great: 76%
TOSHIBA TransMemory 16GB 16,813 User benchmarks, average bench 7% 11GB free, PID 6545 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.7 2.8 2.3 3.9 3.3 3.2 MB/s Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	2.87% Terrible	Read 8.5 Write 7.5 Mixed 4.5 SusWrite 3.2 8% 5.93 MB/s	4K Read 4 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 15% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 2.87% Great: 9%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3000 C16 4x8GB 19,774 User benchmarks, average bench 85% 4 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	63% Good	MC Read 24.9 MC Write 22.4 MC Mixed 24.3 68% 23.9 GB/s	SC Read 13.5 SC Write 14.1 SC Mixed 13.8 39% 13.8 GB/s	Latency 111 36% 111 ns
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 63% Great: 104%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-X470 AORUS GAMING 7 WIFI-CF Builds (Compare 1,019 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 97%

Nuclear submarine

Desktop 85%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 95%

Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Gigabyte X470 AORUS GAMING 7 WIFI - $276

CPU
Ryzen 7 2700XAMD $210Bench 76%, 159,077 samples	424x
Ryzen 7 5800XAMD $200Bench 98%, 128,080 samples	91x
Ryzen 9 5900XAMD $249Bench 99%, 60,132 samples	52x

GPU
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	79x
RTX 2070Nvidia $200Bench 104%, 478,117 samples	63x
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	52x

SSD
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 273%, 381,216 samples	54x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	43x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $158Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	41x

RAM
Trident Z RGB DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $55Bench 84%, 215,644 samples	55x
Trident Z DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GBG.SKILL $113Bench 91%, 87,239 samples	38x
Flare X DDR4 3200 C14 2x8GBG.SKILL $73Bench 98%, 54,616 samples	34x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 73% - Very good

Total price: $1,069

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16