Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot Drive	29.3% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

System	Dell Precision WorkStation T7500 (all builds)
Motherboard	Dell 06FW8P
Memory	9.9 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20180311
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Oct 14 '18 at 15:08
Run Duration	116 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	7%

PC Performing as expected (45^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5607 177 User benchmarks, average bench 57% CPU1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.25 GHz Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)	60.5% Good	Memory 84.3 1-Core 55.9 2-Core 113 54% 84.5 Pts	4-Core 214 8-Core 216 29% 215 Pts	64-Core 222 14% 222 Pts
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 60.5% Great: 61%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro 4000 8,609 User benchmarks, average bench 7% Nvidia(10DE 0780) 2GB Ram: 2GB, Driver: 296.88 Relative performance n/a - atypical extreme
Poor: 7% Great: 7%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung MZ7LN256 256GB 158 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 176GB free (System drive) Firmware: 3L6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 73 83 106 107 99 115 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	29.3% Poor	Read 105 Write 101 Mixed 108 SusWrite 97.2 23% 103 MB/s	4K Read 13.6 4K Write 26 4K Mixed 12.7 51% 17.4 MB/s	DQ Read 93 DQ Write 77.2 DQ Mixed 18.7 32% 63 MB/s
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 29.3% Great: 116%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 6x2GB 38,297 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 6 of 6 slots used 12GB DIMM DDR3 Performing below potential (10^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	37.8% Below average	MC Read 14.4 MC Write 9.4 MC Mixed 15.7 38% 13.2 GB/s	SC Read 8.9 SC Write 7.8 SC Mixed 8.9 24% 8.53 GB/s	Latency 72.9 55% 72.9 ns
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 37.8% Great: 59%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 25%

Raft

Desktop 74%

Battleship

Workstation 25%

Raft

CPU
CPU: Intel Xeon X56901stBench 72%, 2,873 samples	163x
CPU: Intel Xeon X56751stBench 68%, 4,275 samples	88x
Xeon X5690IntelBench 75%, 4,873 samples	74x

Value: 87% - Excellent

Total price: $87

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16