| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 54%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
| Graphics | 2.2% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 85.9% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
High background CPU (24%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)
| System | Lenovo 4290EE8 (all builds) |
| Motherboard | LENOVO 4290EE8 |
| Memory | 4.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit Farben |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20130718 |
| Uptime | 0.9 Days |
| Run Date | Oct 14 '18 at 12:02 |
| Run Duration | 139 Seconds |
| Run User | DEU-User |
| Background CPU | 24% |
PC Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
54%
Above average
|
58% 93.6 Pts
|
23% 174 Pts
|
10% 170 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Intel HD 3000 (Mobile V2 1.3 GHz)
Legend(17AA 21DA) 2GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4459
|
2.2%
Terrible
|
2% 2.5 fps
|
3% 3.02 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
161GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 371 307 309 294 302 288 MB/s
|
85.9%
Excellent
|
81% 362 MB/s
|
115% 38.9 MB/s
|
232% 312 MB/s
|
|
Lexar JumpDrive S25 USB 3.0 64GB-$13
14GB free, PID a838
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 25 25 25 14 12 23 MB/s
|
9.16%
Terrible
|
27% 19.9 MB/s
|
40% 0.83 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung M471B5173DB0-YK0 M471B5173QH0-YK0 8GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (25th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
42.5%
Average
|
42% 14.6 GB/s
|
37% 12.8 GB/s
|
48% 83.7 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds