Performance Results


Gaming 5% Tree trunk	Desktop 48% Yacht	Workstation 5% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 45.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	2.11% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	56% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (58%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-2670QM-$200 51,169 User benchmarks, average bench 56% CPU, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 1.65 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	45.3% Average	Memory 81.3 1-Core 52 2-Core 86.8 49% 73.4 Pts	4-Core 53.4 8-Core 222 14% 138 Pts	64-Core 277 17% 277 Pts
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 45.3% Great: 67%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia NVS 4200M 6,825 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Legend(17AA 21CF) 1GB CLim: 810 MHz, MLim: 400 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 382.5 Performing above expectations (60^th percentile)	2.11% Terrible	Lighting 2.53 Reflection 3.08 Parallax 2 2% 2.54 fps	MRender 3.29 Gravity 2.4 Splatting 2.52 2% 2.74 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 2.11% Great: 2%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial MX100 256GB-$116 55,768 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 58GB free (System drive) Firmware: MU03 SusWrite @10s intervals: 209 116 110 105 119 108 MB/s Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	56% Above average	Read 393 Write 299 Mixed 272 SusWrite 128 61% 273 MB/s	4K Read 20.4 4K Write 51.4 4K Mixed 25.6 91% 32.5 MB/s	DQ Read 112 DQ Write 82.6 DQ Mixed 104 76% 99.6 MB/s
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 56% Great: 97%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471B5273CH0-CH9 2x4GB 10,285 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 2 of 2 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR3 1333 MHz Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)	41% Average	MC Read 13.5 MC Write 13.9 MC Mixed 14.9 40% 14.1 GB/s	SC Read 10.9 SC Write 10.8 SC Mixed 12.1 32% 11.3 GB/s	Latency 78.2 51% 78.2 ns
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 41% Great: 51%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 52%

Yacht

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

CPU
Core i7-2670QMIntel $200Bench 56%, 51,169 samples	2x

GPU
NVS 4200MNvidiaBench 2%, 6,825 samples	2x

SSD
830 128GBSamsung $109Bench 63%, 37,250 samples	1x
IT LCS-256L9S 256GBLiteonBench 78%, 909 samples	1x

RAM
M471B5273CH0-CH9 Kingston 9905428-073.A00LF 8GBSamsungBench 47%, 19 samples	1x
M471B5273CH0-CH9 029E CMSO4GX3M1C1333C9 8GBSamsungBench 39%, 4 samples	1x

Value: 42% - Average

Total price: $309

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16