Samsung 300E5EV/300E4EV/270E5EV/270E4EV/2470EV/2470EE

Performance Results


Gaming 7% Tree trunk	Desktop 52% Yacht	Workstation 6% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 53.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	3.65% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	59.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (30%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago.

System	Samsung 300E5EV/300E4EV/270E5EV/270E4EV/2470EV/2470EE (all builds)
Motherboard	SAMSUNG NP270E5E-X01CL
Memory	5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors,
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20140829
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Oct 13 '18 at 02:44
Run Duration	132 Seconds
Run User	CHL-User
Background CPU	30%

PC Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3-3120M-$100 14,372 User benchmarks, average bench 50% CPU Socket - U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)	53.6% Above average	Memory 78 1-Core 59.3 2-Core 104 51% 80.4 Pts	4-Core 172 8-Core 170 23% 171 Pts	64-Core 173 11% 173 Pts
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 53.6% Great: 59%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz) FAQ - How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs? Sanyo(144D C709) 2GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4276 Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	3.65% Terrible	Lighting 4.07 Reflection 6.08 Parallax 2.78 3% 4.31 fps	MRender 4.86 Gravity 2.23 Splatting 7.7 4% 4.93 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 3.65% Great: 4%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Pro 128GB-$150 34,842 User benchmarks, average bench 90% 24GB free (System drive) Firmware: DXM06B0Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 273 116 123 114 112 118 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	59.8% Above average	Read 430 Write 144 Mixed 192 SusWrite 143 50% 227 MB/s	4K Read 25.7 4K Write 40.9 4K Mixed 22.3 89% 29.6 MB/s	DQ Read 246 DQ Write 59.5 DQ Mixed 80.6 78% 129 MB/s
Poor: 62% ↑ This bench: 59.8% Great: 110%
Seagate ST750LM022 HN-M750MBB 750GB 31,958 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 328GB free Firmware: 2AR20003 SusWrite @10s intervals: 85 80 85 82 83 84 MB/s Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)	45.8% Average	Read 76 Write 82.7 Mixed 45 SusWrite 83.3 53% 71.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 0.8 149% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 45.8% Great: 57%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471B5273EB0-CK0 04CD F3-12800CL9-4GBSK 8GB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	46% Average	MC Read 16.7 MC Write 17.1 MC Mixed 15 46% 16.3 GB/s	SC Read 11.6 SC Write 11.7 SC Mixed 13.2 35% 12.2 GB/s	Latency 84.4 47% 84.4 ns
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 46% Great: 46%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical 300E5EV/300E4EV/270E5EV/270E4EV/2470EV/2470EE Builds (Compare 279 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 49%

Yacht

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

System: Samsung 300E5EV/300E4EV/270E5EV/270E4EV/2470EV/2470EE

CPU
Core i3-3120MIntel $100Bench 50%, 14,372 samples	85x
Core i5-3230MIntel $100Bench 49%, 61,311 samples	76x
Core i3-3110MIntel $70Bench 48%, 34,445 samples	37x

GPU
HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 409,110 samples	188x
HD Graphics (G3 Pentium/Celeron 1.0/1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 28,701 samples	40x
HD Graphics (G2 Pentium/Celeron 1.1/1.15 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 45,735 samples	35x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	14x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	10x
MX500 250GBCrucial $40Bench 101%, 77,177 samples	6x

RAM
M471B5273CH0-YK0 1x4GBSamsungBench 26%, 3,608 samples	25x
M471B5273EB0-CK0 2x4GBSamsungBench 51%, 5,979 samples	21x
M471B5273CH0-YK0 2x4GBSamsungBench 46%, 2,928 samples	21x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 57% - Above average

Total price: $128

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16