| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
| Graphics | 55.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 30.6% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
| Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Very high background CPU (34%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| Motherboard | Asrock H67M (all builds) |
| Memory | 13 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20110218 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Oct 12 '18 at 20:31 |
| Run Duration | 147 Seconds |
| Run User | DEU-User |
| Background CPU | 34% |
PC Performing as expected (41st percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i5-2500
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 25,808,104 GHz (avg)
|
69.7%
Good
|
66% 113 Pts
|
43% 323 Pts
|
21% 343 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119
CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 416.34
|
55.6%
Above average
|
55% 65.5 fps
|
56% 68.9 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
INTENSO 128GB
85GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S8FM04.6
SusWrite @10s intervals: 147 149 173 174 143 154 MB/s
|
30.6%
Below average
|
28% 123 MB/s
|
50% 17.5 MB/s
|
21% 35.8 MB/s
|
|
OCZ Trion 150 480GB-$300
214GB free
Firmware: SAFZ12.2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 286 254 209 289 283 292 MB/s
|
58.5%
Above average
|
69% 307 MB/s
|
82% 28.5 MB/s
|
36% 52.4 MB/s
|
|
SanDisk Ultra Flair USB 3.0 32GB-$8
24GB free, PID 5591
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 21 22 22 22 11 13 MB/s
|
17.5%
Very poor
|
31% 24.2 MB/s
|
208% 3.13 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Kingston 99U5471-053.A00LF 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (20th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
49%
Average
|
50% 17.5 GB/s
|
34% 11.7 GB/s
|
55% 73.2 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical H67M Builds (Compare 169 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asrock H67M - $104
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i5-2500KIntel $246Bench 66%, 143,007 samples | 26x |
| Core i5-2400Intel $250Bench 61%, 166,255 samples | 19x |
| Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples | 15x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples | 19x |
| GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples | 10x |
| HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples | 10x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 68% - Good | Total price: $350 |