Asus ROG STRIX Z370-E GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (17th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 83 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics30.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive75.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus ROG STRIX Z370-E GAMING  (all builds)
Memory27.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180927
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 11 '18 at 18:01
Run Duration154 Seconds
Run User BEL-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8700K-$186
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.55 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
86.9% Excellent
Memory 92.9
1-Core 149
2-Core 277
96% 173 Pts
4-Core 436
8-Core 677
69% 557 Pts
64-Core 930
58% 930 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 86.9%
Great: 100%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485
CLim: 1923 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 391.35
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
30.9% Below average
Lighting 33
Reflection 38
Parallax 30.5
27% 33.8 fps
MRender 68.4
Gravity 33
Splatting 43.1
39% 48.2 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 30.9%
Great: 133%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Pro 256GB-$125
51GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXM02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 408 397 413 427 415 344 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
75.4% Very good
Read 404
Write 416
Mixed 332
SusWrite 400
88% 388 MB/s
4K Read 23.4
4K Write 45
4K Mixed 30.3
98% 32.9 MB/s
DQ Read 91.2
DQ Write 89.5
DQ Mixed 90.8
68% 90.5 MB/s
Poor: 71%
This bench: 75.4%
Great: 124%
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB-$130
236GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 415 412 419 436 448 452 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
79.1% Very good
Read 457
Write 430
Mixed 385
SusWrite 430
96% 425 MB/s
4K Read 25.9
4K Write 44.3
4K Mixed 29.1
100% 33.1 MB/s
DQ Read 82.7
DQ Write 76.4
DQ Mixed 75
58% 78 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 79.1%
Great: 133%
WD Green 2TB (2010)-$100
1.5TB free
Firmware: 0104
SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 20 21 21 21 21 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
15.5% Very poor
Read 32.5
Write 37.7
Mixed 30.2
SusWrite 20.5
22% 30.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.6
143% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 15.5%
Great: 68%
WD Red 3TB (2012)-$50
422GB free
Firmware: 0104
SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 20 21 21 21 21 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
17.6% Very poor
Read 40
Write 39.2
Mixed 33.5
SusWrite 20.5
25% 33.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 0.9
178% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 17.6%
Great: 88%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX 3000 C15 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
87.2% Excellent
MC Read 34.2
MC Write 33.8
MC Mixed 27.9
91% 32 GB/s
SC Read 18.2
SC Write 27.2
SC Mixed 19.9
62% 21.8 GB/s
Latency 62.3
64% 62.3 ns
Poor: 57%
This bench: 87.2%
Great: 109%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ROG STRIX Z370-E GAMING Builds (Compare 10,571 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 111%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 102%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX Z370-E GAMING - $210

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 77% - Very good Total price: $979
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback