Today's hottest deals

Samsung 300E4A/300E5A/300E7A

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 39%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 49.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics1.85% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 2 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemSamsung 300E4A/300E5A/300E7A  (all builds)
MotherboardSAMSUNG 300E4A/300E5A/300E7A
Memory2.5 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20110728
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 11 '18 at 02:17
Run Duration151 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 15%

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-2330M-$150
CPU, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
49.3% Average
Memory 75.9
1-Core 23.8
2-Core 51.9
37% 50.5 Pts
4-Core 132
8-Core 147
18% 139 Pts
64-Core 148
9% 148 Pts
Poor: 30%
This bench: 49.3%
Great: 55%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz)
Sanyo(144D C606) 1.8GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4229
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
1.85% Terrible
Lighting 2.07
Reflection 2.96
Parallax 1.41
2% 2.14 fps
MRender 2.52
Gravity 1.13
Splatting 3.87
2% 2.51 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.85%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Clover CN-M500MBB 500GB
422GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2BA30001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 76 68 73 75 72 77 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
31.9% Below average
Read 37.5
Write 73.4
Mixed 33.1
SusWrite 73.4
40% 54.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
116% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 31.9%
Great: 60%
TOSHIBA MK3265GSX 320GB
39GB free, PID 0621
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.3 0.9 4 3.7 2.4 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
3.23% Terrible
Read 8
Write 4.7
Mixed 7.7
SusWrite 3.3
8% 5.92 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.1
19% 0.33 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.23%
Great: 36%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1x4GB
1 of 4 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
27.7% Poor
MC Read 10.2
MC Write 9.3
MC Mixed 8.8
27% 9.43 GB/s
SC Read 8.3
SC Write 5.5
SC Mixed 5.5
18% 6.43 GB/s
Latency 88.5
45% 88.5 ns
Poor: 13%
This bench: 27.7%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 300E4A/300E5A/300E7A Builds (Compare 172 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Samsung 300E4A/300E5A/300E7A

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 61% - Good Total price: $78
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $248Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback