Today's hottest deals

Samsung 905S3G/906S3G/915S3G

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 21%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 19.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics1.55% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive41.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 2 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemSamsung 905S3G/906S3G/915S3G  (all builds)
MotherboardSAMSUNG NP905S3G-K02PL
Memory1.6 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20130807
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateOct 10 '18 at 20:54
Run Duration144 Seconds
Run User POL-User
Background CPU 12%

 PC Performing below expectations (31st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Quad-Core Processor (up to 1.4GHz)
P0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1 GHz
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
19.9% Very poor
Memory 31
1-Core 15.5
2-Core 30.8
17% 25.8 Pts
4-Core 51.9
8-Core 53
7% 52.5 Pts
64-Core 55.6
3% 55.6 Pts
Poor: 10%
This bench: 19.9%
Great: 28%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD HD 8250
Sanyo(144D C730) 512MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.200.1062.0
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
1.55% Terrible
Lighting 1.77
Reflection 3.62
Parallax 2.38
1% 2.59 fps
MRender 2.19
Gravity 1.6
Splatting 2.57
2% 2.12 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.55%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZMTD128HAFV-000L1 128GB
24GB free (System drive)
Firmware: DXT4
SusWrite @10s intervals: 61 51 46 44 44 47 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
41.4% Average
Read 353
Write 79.8
Mixed 104
SusWrite 48.8
32% 146 MB/s
4K Read 18.9
4K Write 31.6
4K Mixed 12.6
62% 21 MB/s
DQ Read 200
DQ Write 71.9
DQ Mixed 50.4
60% 107 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 41.4%
Great: 63%
Disk Name 960GB
282GB free, PID 2509
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 24 24 23 24 24 23 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
23.2% Poor
Read 27
Write 23.7
Mixed 24.8
SusWrite 23.5
33% 24.8 MB/s
4K Read 4
4K Write 4.3
4K Mixed 4.1
301% 4.13 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 23.2%
Great: 62%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5173QH0-YK0 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1066 MHz
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
9.97% Terrible
MC Read 4
MC Write 2.4
MC Mixed 3.6
10% 3.33 GB/s
SC Read 2.6
SC Write 2.4
SC Mixed 2.9
8% 2.63 GB/s
Latency 249
16% 249 ns
Poor: 12%
This bench: 9.97%
Great: 32%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 905S3G/906S3G/915S3G Builds (Compare 28 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 22%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Samsung 905S3G/906S3G/915S3G

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $248Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback