Intel DX58SO

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (22nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 78 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot Drive	38.1% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago, 4 years ago.

System	INTEL_ DX58SO__
Motherboard	Intel DX58SO (all builds)
Memory	5.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20080914
Uptime	1.3 Days
Run Date	Oct 09 '18 at 12:41
Run Duration	194 Seconds
Run User	GRC-User
Background CPU	13%

PC Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-920-$90 69,074 User benchmarks, average bench 62% J1PR, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.65 GHz Performing as expected (45^th percentile)	61.2% Good	Memory 93 1-Core 63.6 2-Core 111 58% 89.3 Pts	4-Core 164 8-Core 221 24% 193 Pts	64-Core 220 14% 220 Pts
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 61.2% Great: 72%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 460 SE 3,122 User benchmarks, average bench 10% Asus(1043 837B) 1,024MB Ram: 1,023MB, Driver: 306.97 Relative performance n/a - atypical extreme
Poor: 9% Great: 11%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Intel 730 Series 240GB-$250 8,417 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 12GB free (System drive) Firmware: L2010420 SusWrite @10s intervals: 64 54 14 13 44 64 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	38.1% Below average	Read 177 Write 159 Mixed 147 SusWrite 42.3 29% 131 MB/s	4K Read 18.4 4K Write 44.5 4K Mixed 24.9 83% 29.3 MB/s	DQ Read 24.8 DQ Write 80.6 DQ Mixed 31.5 30% 45.6 MB/s
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 38.1% Great: 95%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.11 500GB-$80 27,325 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 199GB free Firmware: SD15 SusWrite @10s intervals: 71 66 70 72 65 68 MB/s Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)	41.8% Average	Read 77 Write 17.8 Mixed 42.5 SusWrite 68.6 38% 51.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 0.7 129% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 41.8% Great: 59%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$33 1,562,409 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 185GB free Firmware: CC44 SusWrite @10s intervals: 113 115 118 122 117 119 MB/s Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)	70% Very good	Read 126 Write 77.3 Mixed 32.8 SusWrite 117 64% 88.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2.6 4K Mixed 0.5 133% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 70% Great: 112%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$50 815,515 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 394GB free Firmware: CC25 SusWrite @10s intervals: 122 120 120 122 119 122 MB/s Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)	68.3% Good	Read 118 Write 84.5 Mixed 52.2 SusWrite 121 68% 93.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.8 140% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 68.3% Great: 114%
Intenso USB 3.0 device 5TB 47 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 944GB free, PID 55aa Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 19 18 18 18 18 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	14.5% Very poor	Read 24.8 Write 22.7 Mixed 24 SusWrite 18.4 30% 22.5 MB/s	4K Read 1.7 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 1.1 115% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 14.5% Great: 78%
Intenso External USB 3.0 4TB 60 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 1.5TB free, PID 578e Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 46 36 61 59 36 50 MB/s Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)	26.2% Poor	Read 48.5 Write 52.3 Mixed 39.5 SusWrite 47.9 64% 47.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 2.8 4K Mixed 0.3 107% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 26.2% Great: 92%
Samsung D3 Station 4TB 1,261 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 162GB free, PID 6125 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 18 18 18 18 18 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	13.6% Very poor	Read 30.8 Write 23.7 Mixed 21.3 SusWrite 18.4 31% 23.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.7 81% 1 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 13.6% Great: 68%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 4x4GB 106,178 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 4 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM Performing below potential (31^st percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	36.3% Below average	MC Read 12.6 MC Write 11.7 MC Mixed 10.9 34% 11.7 GB/s	SC Read 10.2 SC Write 10.6 SC Mixed 10.9 30% 10.6 GB/s	Latency 62 64% 62 ns
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 36.3% Great: 61%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical DX58SO Builds (Compare 42 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 22%

Surfboard

Desktop 70%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 18%

Surfboard

Motherboard: Intel DX58SO - $246

CPU
Core i7-920Intel $90Bench 62%, 69,074 samples	12x
Core i7-950Intel $100Bench 66%, 36,389 samples	10x
Core i7 930Intel $199Bench 64%, 19,497 samples	6x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	4x
GeForce 9600 GTNvidiaBench 4%, 20,826 samples	3x
GTX 960Nvidia $198Bench 33%, 440,282 samples	3x

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	2x
MX500 500GBCrucial $46Bench 106%, 237,241 samples	2x
840 Evo 250GBSamsung $95Bench 96%, 217,115 samples	1x

RAM
4x4GBUnknownBench 43%, 106,178 samples	12x
3x4GBUnknownBench 42%, 39,448 samples	7x
4x2GBUnknownBench 25%, 183,252 samples	5x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 64% - Good

Total price: $495

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16