Asus CG8250

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics32% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive76.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (56%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAsus CG8250  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK CG8250
Memory11.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20111227
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 04 '18 at 08:01
Run Duration165 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU 56%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (34th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2600-$197
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
62.5% Good
Memory 80.6
1-Core 73.1
2-Core 137
59% 96.8 Pts
4-Core 241
8-Core 416
40% 328 Pts
64-Core 467
29% 467 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 62.5%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
Asus(1043 85D6) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1949 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 385.69
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
32% Below average
Lighting 40
Reflection 31
Parallax 37.9
33% 36.3 fps
MRender 38.4
Gravity 37.9
Splatting 36.5
31% 37.6 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 32%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Pro 1TB-$217
433GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXM02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 287 329 329 346 356 350 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
76.7% Very good
Read 371
Write 306
Mixed 283
SusWrite 333
73% 323 MB/s
4K Read 25.4
4K Write 64
4K Mixed 38.4
122% 42.6 MB/s
DQ Read 35.6
DQ Write 108
DQ Mixed 49.9
44% 64.4 MB/s
Poor: 77%
This bench: 76.7%
Great: 124%
Seagate Barracuda Green 2TB-$95
810GB free
Firmware: CC32
SusWrite @10s intervals: 88 91 88 88 88 90 MB/s
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
47.6% Average
Read 75.3
Write 90.8
Mixed 31
SusWrite 88.9
52% 71.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 5.6
4K Mixed 0.4
177% 2.23 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 47.6%
Great: 75%
WD My Book Duo 0A10 4TB
2TB free, PID 0a10
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 150 173 172 186 196 198 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Write 52.8
Mixed 42.5
SusWrite 179
147% 91.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.4
37% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 15% Great: 88%
Kingston DataTraveler 100 G3 USB 3.0 32GB-$9
22GB free, PID 1666
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.7 9.6 12 12 12 12 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Read 30.5
Write 24.5
Mixed 11.3
SusWrite 11.2
24% 19.4 MB/s
4K Read 4.6
4K Mixed 0
26% 2.3 MB/s
Poor: 6% Great: 28%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown SLA302G08-GGNHC Kingston 99U5584-005.A00LF SLA302G08-GGNHC Kingston 99U5584-005.A00LF 16GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
44.8% Average
MC Read 16.1
MC Write 16.4
MC Mixed 14.9
45% 15.8 GB/s
SC Read 10
SC Write 12.9
SC Mixed 11.4
33% 11.4 GB/s
Latency 79.5
50% 79.5 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical CG8250 Builds (Compare 134 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

System: Asus CG8250

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 33% - Below average Total price: $537
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $131Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $186Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback