Performance Results


Gaming 5% Tree trunk	Desktop 32% Sail boat	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 32.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	3.23% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	51% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-2720QM-$85 7,798 User benchmarks, average bench 58% CPU, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 0.8 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	32.2% Below average	Memory 53.5 1-Core 20.6 2-Core 39.4 27% 37.8 Pts	4-Core 60.9 8-Core 86 9% 73.4 Pts	64-Core 94.5 6% 94.5 Pts
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 32.2% Great: 69%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro 1000M 6,108 User benchmarks, average bench 3% Legend(17AA 21D1) 2GB Driver: Ver. 21.21.13.7691 Performing as expected (54^th percentile)	3.23% Terrible	Lighting 3.77 Reflection 4.58 Parallax 1.84 3% 3.4 fps	MRender 6.14 Gravity 4.37 Splatting 3.09 4% 4.53 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 3.23% Great: 3%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung PM830 128GB 13,767 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 71GB free (System drive) Firmware: CXM05H1Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 288 300 299 306 300 305 MB/s Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	51% Above average	Read 373 Write 311 Mixed 242 SusWrite 300 69% 307 MB/s	4K Read 11.4 4K Write 21.9 4K Mixed 11.6 44% 15 MB/s	DQ Read 117 DQ Write 78.2 DQ Mixed 106 77% 100 MB/s
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 51% Great: 73%
Seagate Momentus 2.5" 1TB 266,123 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 138GB free Firmware: 2BA30001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 73 72 68 66 70 93 MB/s Performing as expected (55^th percentile)	45.4% Average	Read 84.5 Write 91.2 Mixed 36.8 SusWrite 73.6 52% 71.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.9 149% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 45.4% Great: 59%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown RMT3020EF48E8W1333 0443 RMT3020EF48E8W1333 Samsung M471B5773DH0-CH9 Samsung M471B5773CHS-CH9 8GB 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 2048, 2048, 2048, 2048 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	33.1% Below average	MC Read 12.8 MC Write 12.9 MC Mixed 12.7 37% 12.8 GB/s	SC Read 5 SC Write 4.3 SC Mixed 5.2 14% 4.83 GB/s	Latency 148 27% 148 ns

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16