| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 38.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor. |
| Graphics | 33.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
| Memory | 4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
| Motherboard | Asus P5K (all builds) |
| Memory | 2.5 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.7 GHz |
| Display | 1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 7 |
| BIOS Date | 20071224 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Sep 29 '18 at 06:53 |
| Run Duration | 127 Seconds |
| Run User | SVK-User |
| Background CPU | 0% |
PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
38.2%
Below average
|
40% 62.3 Pts
|
11% 83.4 Pts
|
5% 84.9 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 390.65
|
33.1%
Below average
|
34% 37.6 fps
|
32% 39.2 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Hitachi HTS543225L9A300 250GB-$30
29GB free (System drive)
Firmware: FBEOC40C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 19 22 22 23 19 MB/s
|
14.1%
Very poor
|
17% 23.3 MB/s
|
55% 0.4 MB/s
| |
|
Kingston DataTraveler 2.0 16GB
5GB free, PID 1665
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.1 4.7 7.3 7.3 7.3 7.3 MB/s
|
6.47%
Terrible
|
16% 12.4 MB/s
|
48% 1.57 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Unknown 4x1GB
4 of 4 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR2
|
18.9%
Very poor
|
18% 6.23 GB/s
|
14% 5.07 GB/s
|
33% 121 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical P5K Builds (Compare 356 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asus P5K - $65
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core2 Quad Q6600Intel $100Bench 42%, 59,658 samples | 91x |
| Core2 Quad Q9550Intel $161Bench 49%, 34,093 samples | 34x |
| Core2 Quad Q9650Intel $170Bench 51%, 16,719 samples | 24x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples | 13x |
| GT 1030NvidiaBench 14%, 185,384 samples | 13x |
| GeForce GT 710NvidiaBench 3%, 187,161 samples | 12x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 46% - Average | Total price: $285 |