Asrock Z87M Pro4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics29.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (35%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsrock Z87M Pro4  (all builds)
Memory24.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20130506
Uptime15.7 Days
Run DateSep 29 '18 at 05:46
Run Duration228 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 35%

 PC Performing above expectations (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4770K-$120
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
74.4% Very good
Memory 82.7
1-Core 103
2-Core 178
71% 121 Pts
4-Core 357
8-Core 560
56% 459 Pts
64-Core 572
35% 572 Pts
Poor: 60%
This bench: 74.4%
Great: 84%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 760-$209
Gigabyte(1458 3614) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1306 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 398.36
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
29.2% Poor
Lighting 34.6
Reflection 30.6
Parallax 39.8
28% 35 fps
MRender 42.2
Gravity 39.8
Splatting 34.3
31% 38.8 fps
Poor: 24%
This bench: 29.2%
Great: 28%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$95
87GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 5,038
Write 3,543
Mixed 3,766
913% 4,115 MB/s
4K Read 607
4K Write 306
4K Mixed 379
1,568% 431 MB/s
DQ Read 1,326
DQ Write 839
DQ Mixed 886
714% 1,017 MB/s
Poor: 64% Great: 118%
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$95
23GB free
Firmware: EXT0
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 472
Write 448
Mixed 351
94% 424 MB/s
4K Read 41.8
4K Write 113
4K Mixed 54.9
194% 70 MB/s
DQ Read 370
DQ Write 343
DQ Mixed 234
209% 316 MB/s
Poor: 64% Great: 118%
Crucial MX100 256GB-$116
19GB free
Firmware: MU01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 321 120 123 112 118 114 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
85.7% Excellent
Read 415
Write 327
Mixed 294
SusWrite 151
66% 297 MB/s
4K Read 28.9
4K Write 123
4K Mixed 42.2
163% 64.6 MB/s
DQ Read 172
DQ Write 275
DQ Mixed 124
122% 190 MB/s
Poor: 65%
This bench: 85.7%
Great: 97%
WD Black 2TB (2010)-$107
16GB free
Firmware: 01.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 95 95 93 93 94 94 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
54.1% Above average
Read 94
Write 92.5
Mixed 68.5
SusWrite 93.7
64% 87.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 3.1
4K Mixed 1
202% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 54.1%
Great: 85%
Seagate Backup+ Desk 3TB
1TB free, PID ab34
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 147 155 154 153 156 155 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
61.1% Good
Read 154
Write 138
Mixed 80.5
SusWrite 153
175% 131 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.9
91% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 61.1%
Great: 72%
Seagate Backup+ Hub BK 6TB
2TB free, PID ab38
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 171 169 169 169 170 170 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
73.2% Very good
Read 146
Write 175
Mixed 104
SusWrite 170
204% 148 MB/s
4K Read 12.9
4K Write 3.9
4K Mixed 1.1
218% 5.97 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 73.2%
Great: 72%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL RipjawsX DDR3 1600 C10 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (14th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
42.7% Average
MC Read 12.7
MC Write 18.1
MC Mixed 12.8
42% 14.5 GB/s
SC Read 9.4
SC Write 16.3
SC Mixed 11.8
36% 12.5 GB/s
Latency 75.8
53% 75.8 ns
Poor: 40%
This bench: 42.7%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z87M Pro4 Builds (Compare 139 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 41%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Asrock Z87M Pro4 - $102

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 93% - Outstanding Total price: $317
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback