Asus TUF Z370-PLUS GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 51%
Yacht
-
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 97.9%, this CPUs suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics9.78% is a very low 3D score (GTX 1070 = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
High background CPU (27%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. Find active processes with Windows task manager (CTRL+SHIFT+ESC).
MotherboardAsus TUF Z370-PLUS GAMING  (all builds)
Memory14 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180702
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 25 '18 at 11:47
Run Duration197 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 27%

 PC Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Single core Quad core Multi core
Intel Core i3-8350K-$169
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
97.9% Outstanding
SC Int 127
SC Float 136
SC Mixed 132
105% 132 Pts
QC Int 492
QC Float 546
QC Mixed 514
117% 517 Pts
MC Int 491
MC Float 547
MC Mixed 512
77% 517 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 97.9%
Great: 109%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630 (Desktop Coffee Lake i3)
Asus(1043 8694) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 22.20.16.4758
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
9.78% Terrible
Lighting 24.1
Reflection 31
Parallax 25.9
8% 27 fps
MRender 26.2
Gravity 20.8
Splatting 38.4
11% 28.5 fps
Poor: 5%
This bench: 9.78%
Great: 9%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$100
54GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 5,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential bench incomplete
Read 2,093
Write 1481
Mixed 672
311% 1,415 MB/s
4K Read 44.2
4K Write 176
4K Mixed 54.4
230% 91.7 MB/s
DQ Read 1,060
DQ Write 1,263
DQ Mixed 722
666% 1,015 MB/s
Poor: 137% Great: 238%
Jmicron Generic 512GB
325GB free
Firmware: 1507
SusWrite @10s intervals: 300 313 312 312 307 306 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
59.9% Above average
Read 363
Write 310
Mixed 254
SusWrite 308
69% 309 MB/s
4K Read 19.7
4K Write 38.3
4K Mixed 13.1
67% 23.7 MB/s
DQ Read 148
DQ Write 156
DQ Mixed 70.7
76% 125 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 59.9%
Great: 79%
Seagate Desktop HDD 4TB (2013)-$65
572GB free
Firmware: CC52
SusWrite @10s intervals: 142 140 151 146 153 154 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
85.7% Excellent
Read 151
Write 116
Mixed 65.8
SusWrite 148
88% 120 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.7
127% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 85.7%
Great: 98%
Seagate Desktop HDD 4TB (2013)-$65
3.5TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 186 188 184 182 189 195 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
105% Outstanding
Read 181
Write 144
Mixed 76.8
SusWrite 187
107% 147 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.8
159% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 105%
Great: 98%
SanDisk Extreme USB 3.0 32GB-$48
26GB free, PID 5580
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 90 92 93 91 94 94 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
92.1% Outstanding
Read 246
Write 96.7
Mixed 83
SusWrite 92.3
150% 129 MB/s
4K Read 10.9
4K Write 11
4K Mixed 8.3
697% 10.1 MB/s
DQ Read 12.7
DQ Write 12.6
DQ Mixed 10.8
843% 12 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 92.1%
Great: 92%
hp v100w 4GB
3GB free, PID 3207
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.4 2.1 0 1.8 4.8 4.9 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
2.71% Terrible
Read 7.7
Write 3.5
Mixed 1.7
SusWrite 3
5% 3.97 MB/s
4K Read 4
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
15% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 2.71%
Great: 8%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
G.SKILL Ripjaws 4 DDR4 2800 C16 4x4GB-$82
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2700 MHz
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
97.1% Outstanding
MC Read 35.5
MC Write 36.9
MC Mixed 30.8
98% 34.4 GB/s
SC Read 21.5
SC Write 39.2
SC Mixed 28.7
85% 29.8 GB/s
Latency 55.2
72% 55.2 ns
Poor: 69%
This bench: 97.1%
Great: 111%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds (explanation by AdoredTV).

Typical TUF Z370-PLUS GAMING Builds (Compare 7,210 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 76%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 117%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 99%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Asus TUF Z370-PLUS GAMING - $132

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 121% - Outstanding Total price: $862
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i7-8700K $350Nvidia GTX 1070 $335Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $104
AMD Ryzen 5 2600 $150Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $210Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $100
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X $274Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti $808Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $97
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $70SanDisk Extreme 64GB $45
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $75G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $646SanDisk Extreme 32GB $48
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $75SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $12
Today's hottest deals
User Guide  •  About  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback