Asus TUF Z370-PLUS GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (73rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 27 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 95.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics7.82% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (27%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus TUF Z370-PLUS GAMING  (all builds)
Memory14 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180702
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 25 '18 at 11:47
Run Duration197 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 27%

 PC Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-8350K-$139
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
95.1% Outstanding
Memory 95.6
1-Core 136
2-Core 268
93% 167 Pts
4-Core 546
8-Core 547
73% 546 Pts
64-Core 547
34% 547 Pts
Poor: 68%
This bench: 95.1%
Great: 93%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630 (Desktop Coffee Lake i3)
Asus(1043 8694) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 22.20.16.4758
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
7.82% Terrible
Lighting 8.03
Reflection 11.9
Parallax 8.09
6% 9.35 fps
MRender 12.5
Gravity 6.93
Splatting 16.7
10% 12 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 7.82%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$45
54GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,093
Write 1481
Mixed 672
311% 1,415 MB/s
4K Read 44.2
4K Write 176
4K Mixed 54.4
230% 91.7 MB/s
DQ Read 1,060
DQ Write 1,263
DQ Mixed 722
666% 1,015 MB/s
Poor: 142% Great: 236%
Jmicron Generic 512GB
325GB free
Firmware: 1507
SusWrite @10s intervals: 300 313 312 312 307 306 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
59.9% Above average
Read 363
Write 310
Mixed 254
SusWrite 308
69% 309 MB/s
4K Read 19.7
4K Write 38.3
4K Mixed 13.1
67% 23.7 MB/s
DQ Read 148
DQ Write 156
DQ Mixed 70.7
76% 125 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 59.9%
Great: 87%
Seagate Desktop HDD 4TB (2013)-$52
572GB free
Firmware: CC52
SusWrite @10s intervals: 142 140 151 146 153 154 MB/s
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
85.7% Excellent
Read 151
Write 116
Mixed 65.8
SusWrite 148
88% 120 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.7
127% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 85.7%
Great: 96%
Seagate Desktop HDD 4TB (2013)-$52
3.5TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 186 188 184 182 189 195 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
105% Outstanding
Read 181
Write 144
Mixed 76.8
SusWrite 187
107% 147 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.8
159% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 105%
Great: 96%
SanDisk Extreme USB 3.0 32GB-$28
26GB free, PID 5580
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 90 92 93 91 94 94 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
92.1% Outstanding
Read 246
Write 96.7
Mixed 83
SusWrite 92.3
150% 129 MB/s
4K Read 10.9
4K Write 11
4K Mixed 8.3
697% 10.1 MB/s
DQ Read 12.7
DQ Write 12.6
DQ Mixed 10.8
843% 12 MB/s
Poor: 25%
This bench: 92.1%
Great: 93%
hp v100w 4GB
3GB free, PID 3207
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.4 2.1 0 1.8 4.8 4.9 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
2.71% Terrible
Read 7.7
Write 3.5
Mixed 1.7
SusWrite 3
5% 3.97 MB/s
4K Read 4
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
15% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 2.71%
Great: 8%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Ripjaws 4 DDR4 2800 C16 4x4GB-$130
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2700 MHz
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
97.1% Outstanding
MC Read 35.5
MC Write 36.9
MC Mixed 30.8
98% 34.4 GB/s
SC Read 21.5
SC Write 39.2
SC Mixed 28.7
85% 29.8 GB/s
Latency 55.2
72% 55.2 ns
Poor: 68%
This bench: 97.1%
Great: 120%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF Z370-PLUS GAMING Builds (Compare 4,302 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 93%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 85%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asus TUF Z370-PLUS GAMING - $135

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 73% - Very good Total price: $844
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback