Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (20th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 80 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 14.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Very high background CPU (61%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Packard Bell EasyNote (all builds)
Motherboard	NEC NEC Versa Premium
Memory	0.5 GB free of 2 GB @ 0.5 GHz
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20051128
Uptime	0.2 Days
Run Date	Sep 21 '18 at 20:42
Run Duration	161 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	61%

PC Performing below expectations (20^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Pentium M processor 1.73GHz-$29 318 User benchmarks, average bench 28% mPGA478, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 1 threads Base clock 1.75 GHz Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	14.9% Very poor	Memory 27.3 1-Core 16.2 2-Core 15.9 15% 19.8 Pts	4-Core 16.2 8-Core 15.6 2% 15.9 Pts	64-Core 15.9 1% 15.9 Pts
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 14.9% Great: 33%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WD WD2500BEVE-00WZT0 250GB 48 User benchmarks, average bench 22% 18GB free (System drive) Firmware: 11.01A11 SusWrite @10s intervals: 17 26 34 28 46 MB/s Performing as expected (41^st percentile)	20.8% Poor	Read 41 Write 37.6 Mixed 30.4 SusWrite 31.2 26% 35 MB/s	4K Read 0.3 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.7 122% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 20.8% Great: 31%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x1GB 68,489 User benchmarks, average bench 14% 2 of 2 slots used 2GB SODIMM Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)	7.68% Terrible	MC Read 2.6 MC Write 2.4 MC Mixed 2.1 7% 2.37 GB/s	SC Read 3.1 SC Write 2.4 SC Mixed 2.3 8% 2.6 GB/s	Latency 271 15% 271 ns
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 7.68% Great: 20%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16