Soneview AIO 1851

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 4%
Tree trunk
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (14th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 86 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 6.82%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics1.09% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (99%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
SystemSoneview AIO 1851  (all builds)
MotherboardAMD AMD CRB
Memory0.2 GB free of 2 GB @ 0.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100521
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateSep 16 '18 at 23:53
Run Duration154 Seconds
Run User VEN-User
Background CPU 99%

 PC Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon Neo X2 Dual Core L325
Socket AM2/S1G2, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.5 GHz, turbo 1.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
6.82% Terrible
Memory 10.7
1-Core 14.4
2-Core 13.5
8% 12.9 Pts
4-Core 16.9
8-Core 20.7
2% 18.8 Pts
64-Core 11.1
1% 11.1 Pts
Poor: 23%
This bench: 6.82%
Great: 38%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4500
Device(1B7D 0002) 256MB
Driver: aticfx32.dll Ver. 8.970.100.9001
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
1.09% Terrible
Lighting 1.4
Reflection 1.96
Parallax 1.09
1% 1.49 fps
MRender 1.38
Gravity 0.57
Splatting 1.57
1% 1.17 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.09%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 2.5" 320GB (2010)-$18
202GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 20 21 47 46 26 49 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
13.4% Very poor
Read 11.5
Write 20.3
Mixed 19.3
SusWrite 34.9
16% 21.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.5
88% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 13.4%
Great: 47%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown SUPERTALENT02 1x2GB
1 of 2 slots used
2GB DIMM DDR2 333 MHz
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
4.15% Terrible
MC Read 1.1
MC Write 1.7
MC Mixed 1.3
4% 1.37 GB/s
SC Read 0.1
SC Write 1.5
SC Mixed 0.4
2% 0.67 GB/s
Latency 397
10% 397 ns
Poor: 9%
This bench: 4.15%
Great: 29%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback