Asus Crosshair V Formula

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 26%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics48.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive61.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
MotherboardAsus Crosshair V Formula  (all builds)
Memory1.6 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display2560 x 1600 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20121017
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 14 '18 at 17:55
Run Duration156 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8350-$130
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
68.1% Good
Memory 87.5
1-Core 71.2
2-Core 142
61% 100 Pts
4-Core 265
8-Core 426
42% 345 Pts
64-Core 422
26% 422 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 68.1%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 390-$325
PowerColor(148C 2358) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1010 MHz, MLim: 1500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 18.9.1
Performing below potential (49th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
48.9% Average
Lighting 56.8
Reflection 60.1
Parallax 87.8
46% 68.2 fps
MRender 60.3
Gravity 54.7
Splatting 77.9
54% 64.3 fps
Poor: 45%
This bench: 48.9%
Great: 52%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Pro 512GB-$129
50GB free (System drive)
Firmware: DXM05B0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 112 76 72 37 38 46 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
61.9% Good
Read 388
Write 175
Mixed 251
SusWrite 63.5
48% 219 MB/s
4K Read 24.5
4K Write 57.1
4K Mixed 32.2
109% 37.9 MB/s
DQ Read 223
DQ Write 167
DQ Mixed 124
112% 171 MB/s
Poor: 66%
This bench: 61.9%
Great: 118%
WD Green 1TB (2010)-$139
0GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 61.3
Write 59.8
Mixed 53.8
44% 58.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.5
99% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 29% Great: 59%
WD Green 3TB (2011)-$60
157GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 104 105 106 106 107 107 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
60.9% Good
Read 106
Write 105
Mixed 68
SusWrite 106
71% 96.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 1
191% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 60.9%
Great: 83%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$70
7GB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 71 90 69 79 77 76 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
47% Average
Read 86.8
Write 92.5
Mixed 81.3
SusWrite 76.9
63% 84.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.7
143% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 47%
Great: 67%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 6GB
1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 2048, 2048 MB
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
37.9% Below average
MC Read 13.8
MC Write 13
MC Mixed 11.9
37% 12.9 GB/s
SC Read 9.2
SC Write 8.3
SC Mixed 11
27% 9.5 GB/s
Latency 70
57% 70 ns
Poor: 12%
This bench: 37.9%
Great: 46%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Crosshair V Formula Builds (Compare 273 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 32%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 26%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus Crosshair V Formula - $220

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 56% - Above average Total price: $680
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback