Samsung 300E5EV/300E4EV/270E5EV/270E4EV/2470EV/2470EE

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Tree trunk	Desktop 39% Jet ski	Workstation 0% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (18th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 82 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 45.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	2.16% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.

Very high background CPU (32%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago.

System	Samsung 300E5EV/300E4EV/270E5EV/270E4EV/2470EV/2470EE (all builds)
Motherboard	SAMSUNG NP270E4E-K04CL
Memory	1.6 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 8.1
BIOS Date	20140828
Uptime	3.9 Days
Run Date	Sep 11 '18 at 02:18
Run Duration	227 Seconds
Run User	BOL-User
Background CPU	32%

PC Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3-3120M-$100 14,372 User benchmarks, average bench 50% CPU Socket - U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)	45.7% Average	Memory 67.1 1-Core 34.8 2-Core 96.7 41% 66.2 Pts	4-Core 141 8-Core 154 20% 148 Pts	64-Core 161 10% 161 Pts
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 45.7% Great: 59%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz) 409,110 User benchmarks, average bench 3% Sanyo(144D C708) 2GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.3368 Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	2.16% Terrible	Lighting 2.37 Reflection 3.15 Parallax 1.62 2% 2.38 fps	MRender 3.14 Gravity 1.33 Splatting 4.52 3% 3 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 2.16% Great: 4%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Hitachi HTS545050A7E380 500GB 64,410 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 93GB free (System drive) Firmware: GG2OACD0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.2 5.3 36 41 49 45 MB/s Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	9.56% Terrible	Read 3.2 Write 8.7 Mixed 1.8 SusWrite 30.2 8% 11 MB/s	4K Read 0 4K Write 0.1 4K Mixed 0.1 13% 0.07 MB/s
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 9.56% Great: 58%
Samsung D3 Station 3TB 1,520 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 2.5TB free, PID 6124 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 23 23 23 23 23 23 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	14.1% Very poor	Read 25 Write 22.8 Mixed 21.8 SusWrite 23.3 31% 23.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.8 88% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 14.1% Great: 79%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471B5273CH0-YK0 1x4GB 3,608 User benchmarks, average bench 26% 1 of 4 slots used 4GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	28.2% Poor	MC Read 10.9 MC Write 10.1 MC Mixed 9.7 29% 10.2 GB/s	SC Read 6 SC Write 4.1 SC Mixed 4.8 14% 4.97 GB/s	Latency 108 37% 108 ns
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 28.2% Great: 33%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical 300E5EV/300E4EV/270E5EV/270E4EV/2470EV/2470EE Builds (Compare 279 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 49%

Yacht

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

System: Samsung 300E5EV/300E4EV/270E5EV/270E4EV/2470EV/2470EE

CPU
Core i3-3120MIntel $100Bench 50%, 14,372 samples	85x
Core i5-3230MIntel $100Bench 49%, 61,311 samples	76x
Core i3-3110MIntel $70Bench 48%, 34,445 samples	37x

GPU
HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 409,110 samples	188x
HD Graphics (G3 Pentium/Celeron 1.0/1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 28,701 samples	40x
HD Graphics (G2 Pentium/Celeron 1.1/1.15 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 45,735 samples	35x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	14x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	10x
MX500 250GBCrucial $40Bench 101%, 77,177 samples	6x

RAM
M471B5273CH0-YK0 1x4GBSamsungBench 26%, 3,608 samples	25x
M471B5273EB0-CK0 2x4GBSamsungBench 51%, 5,979 samples	21x
M471B5273CH0-YK0 2x4GBSamsungBench 46%, 2,928 samples	21x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 57% - Above average

Total price: $128

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16